首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Efficacy of tigecycline vs. imipenem in the treatment of experimental Acinetobacter baumannii murine pneumonia.
【24h】

Efficacy of tigecycline vs. imipenem in the treatment of experimental Acinetobacter baumannii murine pneumonia.

机译:替加环素与亚胺培南在治疗鲍曼不动杆菌鼠肺炎中的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The in vivo activity of tigecycline was evaluated in an experimental pneumonia model (C57BL/6 mice) by Acinetobacter baumannii. Two clinical strains were used: minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem and tigecycline 1 and 2 microg/mL (imipenem-susceptible, IPM-S), and 8 and 2 microg/mL (imipenem-intermediate, IPM-I), respectively. For imipenem (30 mg/Kg), T/CMI (h) were 1.04 and 0.51 for IPM-S and IPM-I, respectively. For tigecycline (5 mg/Kg), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC(0-24 h) (serum and lung) were 9.24 and 4.37 (for the two strains), respectively. In the efficacy experiments with the IPM-S, imipenem (log CFU/g 3.59 +/- 0.78, p = 0.006) and tigecycline (2.82 +/- 1.2, p = 0.054) decreased the bacterial counts in lungs with respect to its controls; with the IPM-I, both imipenem (1.21 +/- 0.52, p = 0.002) and tigecycline (3.21 +/- 0.28, p = 0.035) decreased the bacterial counts with respect to the controls. In the survival experiments, with the IPM-S, the mortality was the same in the control (67%) and in the tigecycline (77%) groups, and imipenem reduced it (21%, p = 0.025); with the IPM-I, the mortality was the same in the control (87%) and in the tigecycline (85%) groups, and imipenem (0%) reduced it (p < 0.001). In summary, the present study shows that tigecycline is less efficacious than imipenem in the treatment of experimental A. baumannii pneumonia caused by IPM-S and IPM-I strains.
机译:通过鲍曼不动杆菌在实验性肺炎模型(C57BL / 6小鼠)中评估了替加环素的体内活性。使用了两种临床菌株:亚胺培南和替加环素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)1和2 microg / mL(亚胺培南敏感,IPM-S),分别为8和2 microg / mL(亚胺培南中间体,IPM-1) 。亚胺培南(30 mg / Kg)的IPM-S和IPM-1的T / CMI(h)分别为1.04和0.51。对于替加环素(5 mg / Kg),浓度-时间曲线(AUC)/ MIC(0-24 h)(血清和肺)下的面积分别为9.24和4.37(对于两种菌株)。在使用IPM-S进行的功效实验中,亚胺培南(log CFU / g 3.59 +/- 0.78,p = 0.006)和tigecycline(2.82 +/- 1.2,p = 0.054)相对于对照组降低了肺部细菌计数;对于IPM-1,亚胺培南(1.21 +/- 0.52,p = 0.002)和tigecycline(3.21 +/- 0.28,p = 0.035)均相对于对照减少细菌计数。在存活实验中,使用IPM-S,对照组(67%)和替加环素(77%)组的死亡率相同,亚胺培南降低了死亡率(21%,p = 0.025)。使用IPM-1时,对照组(87%)和替加环素(85%)组的死亡率相同,亚胺培南(0%)降低了死亡率(p <0.001)。总而言之,本研究表明,替加环素在治疗由IPM-S和IPM-1菌株引起的实验性鲍曼不动杆菌中的效果不如亚胺培南。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号