...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >The use of cuffed tracheal tubes for paediatric tracheal intubation, a survey of specialist practice in the United Kingdom.
【24h】

The use of cuffed tracheal tubes for paediatric tracheal intubation, a survey of specialist practice in the United Kingdom.

机译:袖带式气管导管在小儿气管插管中的使用,这是对英国专业实践的一项调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For more than 50 yr, uncuffed tracheal tubes have been the gold standard for intubation in children under the age of 8 yr. However, recently there has been interest in the use of cuffed tubes in paediatric practice. This survey aimed to benchmark UK practice with regard to tracheal intubation within specialist paediatric centres, exploring current cuffed tracheal tube use in children. METHODS: A questionnaire was e-mailed to the paediatric intensive care unit and anaesthetic department clinical leads in all UK specialist paediatric hospitals with a paediatric intensive care unit (n = 30). Information was requested on the use of tracheal tubes across all paediatric age groups, as well as the reasons for non-use and the incidence of complications attributed to cuffed tubes. RESULTS: A total of 20 paediatric intensive care unit and 15 anaesthetic questionnaires were returned, equating to a response rate of 67% and 50%, respectively. Only 5% of the paediatric intensive care unit and 7% of the anaesthetic respondents routinely use a cuffed tube in children under the age of 8 yr. The commonest reason cited in both groups for non-cuff use was that there is minimal benefit to be gained over using an uncuffed tracheal tube. The most frequent specific indication for use of a cuffed tube was a reduced lung compliance (60% respondents both groups). In all, 45% of the paediatric intensive care unit respondents and 100% of the anaesthetists reported that they did not routinely monitor the intracuff pressure when using a cuffed tube. The incidence of observed complications attributed to the use of cuffed tubes was far higher amongst paediatric intensive care unit consultants (65% vs. 7% anaesthetists); however, the majority in both groups stated that such complications were no more common than when using an uncuffed tube (60% paediatric intensive care unit and 53% anaesthetists). CONCLUSION: Cuffed tracheal tubes are rarely routinely used in children, particularly in the under 8 yr age group, in specialist paediatric centres in the UK. When used, it is predominantly for a specific indication, and the monitoring of intracuff pressure is not routine. Current expert consensus is that complications are equally as common when using a cuffed as an uncuffed tube.
机译:背景与目的:50多年来,未充气的气管导管一直是8岁以下儿童插管的金标准。但是,最近在儿科实践中使用袖带管已引起关注。这项调查的目的是在专门的儿科中心对英国在气管插管方面的实践进行基准测试,以探讨当前儿童袖带式气管插管的使用情况。方法:将问卷调查表通过电子邮件发送给英国所有设有儿科重症监护室的专科儿科医院的儿科重症监护室和麻醉科临床主管(n = 30)。要求提供有关在所有儿科年龄组中使用气管导管的信息,以及不使用气管导管的原因以及袖带管导管并发症的发生率。结果:总共返回了20个儿科重症监护病房和15个麻醉问卷,分别相当于67%和50%的回应率。在8岁以下的儿童中,只有5%的儿科重症监护病房和7%的麻醉剂受访者常规使用袖套管。两组中提到的非袖带使用的最普遍原因是,与使用非袖带式气管导管相比,获得的益处最小。使用袖带管最常见的具体指征是肺顺应性降低(两组均60%的受访者)。总计,有45%的儿科重症监护室应答者和100%的麻醉师报告说,他们在使用袖带管时没有常规监测袖带内压力。在儿科重症监护室中,观察到的由于使用袖带管引起的并发症的发生率要高得多(65%对7%的麻醉师);然而,两组中的大多数都说这种并发症并不比使用无袖管时更为常见(60%的儿科重症监护室和53%的麻醉师)。结论:在英国的专业儿科中心,儿童很少使用带气管导管,特别是在8岁以下的儿童中。使用时,主要用于特定适应症,并且袖带内压力的监测不是常规的。当前专家的共识是,使用袖带管和非袖带管时,并发症的发生率相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号