...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane and propofol during anaesthesia and the postoperative period in coronary bypass graft surgery: a double-blind randomised study.
【24h】

Cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane and propofol during anaesthesia and the postoperative period in coronary bypass graft surgery: a double-blind randomised study.

机译:七氟醚和丙泊酚在麻醉期间和冠状动脉旁路移植术术后的心脏保护作用:一项双盲随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Volatile anaesthetics may have direct cardioprotective properties due to effects similar to ischaemic preconditioning and postconditioning. Clinical results in cardiac surgery patients are controversial and may be related to the timing of administration of anaesthetics intraoperatively.We hypothesised that the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane in coronary bypass graft surgical patients would be greater if administration during anaesthesia continued in the ICU for at least 4 h postoperatively until weaning from mechanical ventilation.Double-blind, double-dummy, prospective, randomised and controlled clinical trial.In a single centre between June 2006 and June 2007.Seventy-five adult patients were assigned randomly to receive anaesthesia and postoperative sedation either with propofol (control, n = 37) or sevoflurane (n = 36).Myocardial biomarkers were measured before surgery, at the time of admission to the intensive care unit and at 6, 24, 48 and 72 h. The need for inotropic support, and lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital were also recorded.Elevation of myocardial biomarkers was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were haemodynamic events and lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital.Necrosis biomarkers increased significantly in the postoperative period in both groups with no significant differences at any time. Inotropic support was needed in 72.7 and 54.3% of patients in the propofol and sevoflurane groups, respectively (P = 0.086). There were no significant differences in haemodynamic variables, incidence of arrhythmias, myocardial ischaemia or and lengths of stay in the ICU and hospital between the two groups.In patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery, continuous administration of sevoflurane as a sedative in the ICU for at least 4 h postoperatively did not yield significant improvements in the extent and time course of myocardial damage biomarkers compared to propofol.
机译:挥发性麻醉药由于与缺血预处理和后处理相似的作用,可能具有直接的心脏保护作用。心脏外科手术患者的临床结果存在争议,可能与术中使用麻醉药的时间有关。我们假设,如果在ICU中继续麻醉至少4次,则七氟醚对冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的心脏保护作用会更大。术后h直至机械通气断奶双盲,双假人,前瞻性,随机和对照临床试验.2006年6月至2007年6月间在一个中心进行随机分组,对55名成年患者进行随机麻醉和术后镇静异丙酚(对照组,n = 37)或七氟醚(n = 36)。在手术前,重症监护室入院时以及第6、24、48和72小时测量心肌生物标志物。还记录了对正性肌力的支持以及在重症监护室和医院的住院时间。心肌生物标志物的升高是主要终点。次要终点是血流动力学事件和在重症监护病房和医院的住院时间。两组的坏死生物标志物在术后均显着增加,且在任何时候均无显着性差异。异丙酚和七氟醚组中分别有72.7%和54.3%的患者需要正性肌力支持(P = 0.086)。两组之间的血流动力学变量,心律失常的发生率,心肌缺血或在ICU和医院的住院时间没有显着差异。在接受冠状动脉搭桥术的患者中,在ICU连续使用七氟醚作为镇静剂治疗与丙泊酚相比,术后至少4 h心肌损伤生物标志物的程度和时间进程没有明显改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号