首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >General anaesthesia combined with bilateral paravertebral blockade (T5-6) vs. general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

General anaesthesia combined with bilateral paravertebral blockade (T5-6) vs. general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

机译:全身麻醉联合双侧椎旁阻滞(T5-6)与全身麻醉进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项前瞻性,随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The efficiency of bilateral paravertebral blockade combined with general anaesthesia (active) vs. general anaesthesia alone (control) in reducing postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy was evaluated using a prospective randomized study design. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either group. Nerve-stimulator guided paravertebral blockade at the T5-6 level was performed with a local anaesthetic mixture (0.30 mL kg(-1)). Twenty millilitres of the mixture contained lidocaine 2% 6 mL; lidocaine 2% 6 mL with epinephrine 1/200 000; bupivacaine 0.5% 5 mL; fentanyl 1 mL (50 microg mL(-1)) and clonidine 2 mL (150 microg mL(-1)). Postoperative pain and consumption of opioids were assessed during the first 72 h. RESULTS: Two-times 30 patients were analysed. Patient characteristics data, and pre- and peroperative variables were similar in both groups. Mean pain scores visual analogue scale were significantly less with active compared with control (P < 0.05) at 6h (1.56 +/- 1.58 vs. 4.78 +/- 1.67), at 12 h (1.52 +/- 1.58 vs. 3.81 +/- 1.63), at 24 h (1.16 +/- 1.34 vs. 2.71 +/- 1.50), at 36h (0.68 +/- 1.02 vs. 2.29 +/- 1.41), at 48h (0.60 +/- 1.04 vs. 1.61 +/- 1.33) and at 72 h (0.40 +/- 0.86 vs. 1.19 +/- 1.16). The number of patients consuming supplemental analgesics was significantly less (P < 0.05) with active compared with control, at 6 h (6 vs. 29), at 12 h (2 vs. 26), at 24 h (1 vs. 23) and at 36 h (2 vs. 15). More patients were free from nausea (P < 0.05) with active compared with control at 6 h (23 vs. 9) and at 12 h (29 vs. 19). CONCLUSION: When used as a complement to general anaesthesia, bilateral nerve-stimulator guided paravertebral blockade with lidocaine, bupivacaine, fentanyl and clonidine may improve postoperative pain relief.
机译:背景与目的:采用前瞻性随机研究设计评估了腹腔镜胆囊切除术后双侧椎旁阻滞联合全身麻醉(主动)与单纯全身麻醉(对照)在减轻术后疼痛方面的效果。方法:将患者随机分为两组。用局部麻醉剂混合物(0.30 mL kg(-1))在T5-6水平进行神经刺激器引导的椎旁阻断。二十毫升混合物中含有2%的利多卡因6毫升。利多卡因2%6 mL与肾上腺素1/200 000;布比卡因0.5%5 mL;芬太尼1 mL(50 microg mL(-1))和可乐定2 mL(150 microg mL(-1))。在最初的72小时内评估术后疼痛和阿片类药物的消耗。结果:两次分析30例患者。两组患者的特征数据以及术前和术前变量均相似。与对照组相比,在6h(12h)(1.52 +/- 1.58 vs. 3.81 + /)时,活动时的平均疼痛评分视觉模拟量表与对照组相比(P <0.05)显着减少(P <0.05)。 -1.63),24小时(1.16 +/- 1.34与2.71 +/- 1.50),36小时(0.68 +/- 1.02与2.29 +/- 1.41),48小时(0.60 +/- 1.04与1.61) +/- 1.33)和72小时(0.40 +/- 0.86与1.19 +/- 1.16)。与对照组相比,在6 h(6 vs. 29),12 h(2 vs. 26),24 h(1 vs. 23)时,服用补充镇痛剂的患者数量明显少于对照组(P <0.05)。在36小时(2比15)。与对照组相比,有更多患者在6 h(23 vs. 9)和12 h(29 vs. 19)活动时没有恶心(P <0.05)。结论:当作为全身麻醉的补充剂时,用利多卡因,布比卡因,芬太尼和可乐定对双侧神经刺激器进行椎旁阻滞可改善术后疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号