首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia vs. sevoflurane-fentanyl-based anaesthesia for immediate postoperative ophthalmic evaluation following strabismus surgery.
【24h】

Propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia vs. sevoflurane-fentanyl-based anaesthesia for immediate postoperative ophthalmic evaluation following strabismus surgery.

机译:斜视手术后立即进行基于异丙酚-瑞芬太尼的麻醉与基于七氟醚-芬太尼的麻醉的眼科评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Following strabismus surgery, immediate postoperative ophthalmic evaluation may be desired. Thus, an anaesthetic technique allowing rapid recovery of ocular motility is required. Saccadic eye movements is a biophysical monitor of ocular motility and may be used to assess recovery from anaesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare the time to the recovery of saccadic eye movements in patients, following one of two anaesthetic techniques: Propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia vs. sevoflurane-fentanyl-based anaesthesia. METHODS: Fifty adult patients undergoing strabismus surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups: patients in Group R received induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, while patients in Group S received induction of anaesthesia with propofol and fentanyl and maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Recovery from anaesthesia was measured from the time all anaesthetics were turned off and was assessed every 2 min. Recovery time was attained when patients were able to generate brisk saccadic eye movements. At recovery time, the ophthalmic evaluation was started. RESULTS: The mean recovery time of saccadic eye movements was significantly shorter in the Group R when compared to the Group S (12.1 +/- 4.3 min vs. 21.5 +/- 4.7 min, respectively, P < 0.0001). More patients in Group S experienced nausea and vomiting postoperatively as compared to Group R (9/25 vs. 2/25, respectively, P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthesia may be a useful technique in strabismus surgery when immediate postoperative ophthalmic evaluation is desired. When compared to sevoflurane maintenance of anaesthesia, it allows for a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia as judged by recovery of saccadic eye movements and a decreased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
机译:背景与目的:斜视手术后,可能需要立即进行术后眼科评估。因此,需要允许眼动性快速恢复的麻醉技术。眼跳运动是眼球运动的生物物理监测器,可用于评估麻醉后的恢复情况。这项研究的目的是比较以下两种麻醉技术之一,使患者的眼部眼球运动恢复的时间:基于异丙酚-瑞芬太尼的麻醉与基于七氟醚-芬太尼的麻醉。方法:将50例行斜视手术的成年患者随机分为两组:R组患者接受丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉诱导和维持麻醉,S组患者接受丙泊酚和芬太尼麻醉诱导并维持麻醉。七氟醚。从关闭所有麻醉剂的时间开始测量麻醉的恢复,并每2分钟评估一次。当患者能够产生轻快的眼跳时,恢复时间就达到了。恢复时,开始眼科评估。结果:与S组相比,R组的眼球运动的平均恢复时间明显短于S组(分别为12.1 +/- 4.3分钟和21.5 +/- 4.7分钟,P <0.0001)。与R组相比,S组患者术后恶心和呕吐的发生率更高(分别为9/25和2/25,P = 0.037)。结论:当需要立即进行术后眼科评估时,基于异丙酚-瑞芬太尼的麻醉可能是一种在斜视手术中有用的技术。与七氟醚维持麻醉相比,通过眼跳运动的恢复和术后恶心和呕吐的减少,可以使麻醉恢复更快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号