首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging >Validation of Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting with 24-h plasma clearance in cirrhotic patients with ascites.
【24h】

Validation of Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting with 24-h plasma clearance in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

机译:Tikhonov具有24小时血浆清除率的Tikhonov自适应正则伽玛变量拟合在肝硬化腹水患者中的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim was to compare late-time extrapolation of plasma clearance (CL) from Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting (Tk-GV) and from mono-exponential (E1) fitting. METHODS: Ten (51)Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid bolus IV studies in adults--8 with ascites--assessed for liver transplantation, with 12-16 plasma samples drawn from 5-min to 24-h, were fit with Tk-GV and E1 models and CL results were compared using Passing-Bablok fitting. RESULTS: The 24-h CL(Tk-GV) values ranged from 11.4 to 79.7 ml/min. Linear regression of 4- versus 24-h CL(Tk-GV) yielded no significant departure from a slope of 1, whereas the 4- versus 24-h CL(E1) slope, 1.56, was significantly increased. For CL(Tk-GV-24-h) versus CL(E1-24-h), there was a biased slope and intercept (0.85, 5.97 ml/min). Moreover, the quality of fitting of 24-h data was significantly better for Tk-GV than for E1, as follows. For 10 logarithm of concentration curves, higher r values were obtained for each Tk-GV fit (median 0.998) than for its corresponding E1 fit (median 0.965), with p < 0.0001 (paired t-test of z-statistics from Fisher r-z transformations). The E1 fit quality degraded with increasing V/W [volume of distribution (l) per kg body weight, p = 0.003]. However, Tk-GV fit quality versus V/W was uncorrelated (p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: CL(E1) values were dependent on sample time and the quality of fit was poor and degraded with increasing ascites, consistent with current opinion that CL(E1) is contraindicated in ascitic patients. CL(Tk-GV) was relatively more accurate and the good quality of fit was unaffected by ascites. CL(Tk-GV) was the preferred method for the accurate calculation of CL and was useful despite liver failure and ascites.
机译:目的:目的是比较从Tikhonov自适应正则伽玛变量拟合(Tk-GV)和从单指数(E1)拟合中血浆清除率(CL)的最新外推。方法:对十名(51)Cr-乙二胺四乙酸大剂量静脉输注静脉曲张研究在成人--8腹水中进行,评估为肝移植,并在5分钟至24小时内抽取12-16份血浆样品,将其与Tk-GV和使用Passing-Bablok拟合比较E1模型和CL结果。结果:24小时CL(Tk-GV)值在11.4至79.7 ml / min的范围内。 4小时与24小时CL(Tk-GV)的线性回归没有明显偏离斜率1,而4小时与24小时CL(E1)斜率1.56则显着增加。对于CL(Tk-GV-24-h)与CL(E1-24-h),斜率和截距存在偏差(0.85,5.97 ml / min)。此外,Tk-GV的24小时数据拟合质量明显好于E1,如下所示。对于10个浓度曲线的对数,每个Tk-GV拟合(中位数0.998)获得的r值均高于其对应的E1拟合(中位数0.965),并且p <0.0001(Fisher rz变换的z统计量的配对t检验) )。 E1的配合质量随V / W的增加而降低[每千克体重的分布量(l),p = 0.003]。但是,Tk-GV拟合质量与V / W无关(p = 0.8)。结论:CL(E1)值取决于采样时间,并且随着腹水的增加,贴合质量较差且退化,这与当前认为腹水患者禁忌CL(E1)的观点一致。 CL(Tk-GV)相对更准确,并且良好的拟合质量不受腹水影响。 CL(Tk-GV)是精确计算CL的首选方法,尽管有肝功能衰竭和腹水,它仍然有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号