...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of neurology: the official journal of the European Federation of Neurological Societies >Endovascular therapy in 201 patients with acute symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery
【24h】

Endovascular therapy in 201 patients with acute symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery

机译:血管内治疗201例颈内动脉急性症状性闭塞

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and purpose: Endovascular therapy is used increasingly for treatment of acute symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion, although randomized trials are lacking. Predictors of outcome are therefore of special interest. Methods: From 1992 to 2010 we treated 201 patients with acute ICA occlusion with intra-arterial pharmacological thrombolysis (32), endovascular mechanical therapy (78) or a combination of both (91). All data were assessed prospectively. Results: There were 76/38% patients with tandem occlusions [ICA plus middle (MCA) or anterior cerebral arteries (ACA)], 18/9% without concomitant occlusions of major intracranial arteries (ICA plus branch occlusion) and 107/53% with functional ICA-T occlusions (ICA plus MCA and ACA). Median baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 17. Good recanalization (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 2-3) was achieved in (157/201) 78% patients and good reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2-3) in (151/182) 83%. Better recanalization rates were obtained with mechanical approaches, with/without thrombolytics (78/91=86% and 64/78=82%) compared with pharmacological thrombolysis only (15/32 = 47%; P<0.001). Twelve patients (6%) suffered symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages. The 3-month outcome was favourable [modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-2] in 54/28% patients and moderate (mRS 0-3) in 90/46%; 60/31% patients died. Only 17/16% patients with functional ICA-T occlusions had favourable outcomes compared with 32/44% with tandem occlusions and 5/31% with ICA plus cerebral branch occlusions (P=0.001). In multivariate analysis age [odds ratio (OR)=0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.93-0.98], NIHSS on admission (OR=0.9, 95% CI=0.83-0.98) and functional ICA-T occlusion (OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.16-0.77) were non-modifiable predictors, and vessel recanalization was the only modifiable predictor of outcome (OR=9.30, 95% CI=2.03-42.63). Conclusions: The outcome of acute symptomatic ICA occlusion is poor. However, recanalization is associated with better outcome, and recanalization rates with mechanical techniques were superior to merely pharmacological recanalization attempts.
机译:背景和目的:尽管缺乏随机试验,但血管内治疗正越来越多地用于治疗急性症状性颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞。因此,对结果的预测器特别感兴趣。方法:从1992年到2010年,我们采用动脉内药理溶栓治疗(32),血管内机械治疗(78)或两者结合治疗(201)急性ICA阻塞的201例患者。所有数据均经过前瞻性评估。结果:有76/38%的患者发生串联闭塞[ICA加中部(MCA)或前脑动脉(ACA)],18/9%的患者未伴有颅内大动脉闭塞(ICA +分支闭塞),有107/53%具有功能性ICA-T闭塞(ICA加上MCA和ACA)。美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)的基线中位数为17。在(157/201)78%的患者中,其再通性良好(心肌梗塞2-3的血栓溶解),而在78%的患者中再灌注良好(脑梗塞2-3的血栓溶解) (151/182)83%。与仅使用药理溶栓法(15/32 = 47%; P <0.001)相比,使用机械方法在有/无溶栓剂情况下(78/91 = 86%和64/78 = 82%)可获得更高的再通率。十二名患者(6%)出现了症状性颅内出血。 54/28%的患者的3个月预后良好[改良Rankin评分(mRS)0-2],中度(mRS 0-3)为90/46%。 60/31%的患者死亡。 ICA-T功能性闭塞的患者中只有17/16%的患者有良好的预后,而串联性闭塞的患者为32/44%,ICA加脑分支闭塞的患者为5/31%(P = 0.001)。在多元分析年龄[赔率(OR)= 0.96,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.93-0.98],入院时NIHSS(OR = 0.9,95%CI = 0.83-0.98)和功能性ICA-T闭塞(OR = 0.35,95%CI = 0.16-0.77)是不可更改的预测指标,血管再通是唯一可更改的结局指标(OR = 9.30,95%CI = 2.03-42.63)。结论:急性症状性ICA闭塞的结果较差。然而,再通与更好的预后相关,并且机械技术的再通率优于仅药理再通尝试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号