首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Agronomy >Comparative advantages of conservation agriculture based rice-wheat rotation systems under water and salt dynamics typical for the irrigated arid drylands in Central Asia
【24h】

Comparative advantages of conservation agriculture based rice-wheat rotation systems under water and salt dynamics typical for the irrigated arid drylands in Central Asia

机译:在中亚灌溉干旱地区典型的水和盐动态下,基于保护性农业的稻麦轮作系统的比较优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Central Asia, the increasing water shortage and labor scarcity, high cost of production, increasing secondary soil salinization, and land abandonment are compelling farmers to change to water saving irrigation and conservation agriculture (CA) technologies. Such CA practices aim at maximizing profits while making a better use of soil and water resources lowering labor demands, farm power and production costs. The CA experiments with rice-wheat systems combined two establishment methods (beds and flats) with three residue levels (all zero tillage) and with alternate wet and dry (AWD) irrigation followed by surface seeded wheat (SSW); and conventional tillage (dry tillage) and continuously flooded rice (water seeded rice, WSR) followed by SSW. These were evaluated for 2 years (2008-2010) by using several financial indicators such as gross margins (GMs) estimates and benefit/cost ratio (BCR) while accounting for the soil water balance and soil salinity dynamics. The GM and BCR were higher under WSR-SSW than under treatments of dry seeded rice (DSR)-SSW. Both were higher under residue removal compared to residue retainments in DSR-SSW. Surface seeded wheat, which involved minor production costs, yielded >6 t ha(-1) in both years in all treatments. Furthermore, >80% of the total irrigation water was applied to rice. Yet, >90% from WSR-SSW and similar to 67% from DSR-SSW were lost through seepage and percolation. Dry seeded rice in bed (DSRB)-SSW saved 15% more irrigation water compared to dry seeded rice in flat (DSRF)-SSW and 67% compared to WSR-SSW. Soil salinity decreased with rice cultivation. After 2 years, WSR-SSW had the lowest while residue-removed DSRB-SSW had the highest salinity level at all soil depths. Groundwater salinity under deep groundwater tables was higher under treatments of DSR-SSW than under WSR-SSW. However, under shallow groundwater tables, groundwater salinity was higher under WSR-SSW than under DSR-SSW. Under the conditions that irrigation water is subsidized or even free of charge, conventional WSR-SSW into the standing rice field (20 days before rice harvest) is the most profitable option. However, under water scarce conditions, the CA based rice-wheat system could be a suitable alternative to cope with water scarcity and secondary soil salinization. Before this crop production system can be advocated and promoted, it needs to be flanked by adequate water pricing policies. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在中亚,日益严重的缺水和劳动力短缺,高生产成本,次生土壤盐渍化以及土地荒废正迫使农民转向节水灌溉和保护性农业(CA)技术。这种CA做法旨在最大程度地提高利润,同时更好地利用土壤和水资源,从而降低劳动力需求,农场电力和生产成本。水稻-小麦系统的CA试验结合了两种建立方法(床和平地),三种残留水平(全部为零耕种),以及干湿交替灌溉(AWD),然后播种有表层小麦(SSW);常规耕作(干耕)和连续淹水的水稻(水种水稻,WSR),其次是SSW。在评估土壤水分平衡和土壤盐分动态的同时,通过使用多项财务指标(例如毛利率(GMs)估算和收益/成本比(BCR))对这些指标进行了2年(2008-2010年)的评估。 WSR-SSW处理的GM和BCR高于干稻(DSR)-SSW处理。与DSR-SSW中的残留物保留相比,残留物清除率均更高。在所有处理中,两年播种的表面播种小麦的生产成本均较低,两年均> 6 t ha(-1)。此外,> 80%的灌溉水用于水稻。但是,WSR-SSW损失了90%以上的水,而DSR-SSW损失了67%的水由于渗漏和渗漏而流失了。与平板(DSRF)-SSW相比,卧床干稻(DSRB)-SSW节省了15%的灌溉水,与WSR-SSW相比,节省了67%。水稻种植后土壤盐分下降。 2年后,在所有土壤深度下,WSR-SSW的盐度最低,而去除残留物的DSRB-SSW的盐度最高。在DSR-SSW处理下,深层地下水位的地下水盐度高于WSR-SSW处理。然而,在浅层地下水位下,WSR-SSW下的地下水盐度高于DSR-SSW下的盐度。在补贴灌溉水甚至免费的条件下,常规的WSR-SSW进入立稻田(水稻收获前20天)是最有利的选择。然而,在缺水条件下,基于CA的稻麦系统可能是应对缺水和土壤次生盐渍化的合适选择。在倡导和推广这种农作物生产系统之前,必须先制定适当的水价政策。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号