首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Agronomy >Evaluation of the Agro-Ecological Zone methods for the study of climate change with micro farming decisions in sub-Saharan Africa.
【24h】

Evaluation of the Agro-Ecological Zone methods for the study of climate change with micro farming decisions in sub-Saharan Africa.

机译:评估撒哈拉以南非洲以微耕作作决定研究气候变化的农业生态区方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper evaluates the Agro-Ecological Zone (AEZ) methods for understanding agriculture and measuring the impacts of climate change on agriculture with the observed farming decisions in sub-Saharan Africa. The Agro-Ecological Zone (AEZ) method is explained using the concept of the Length of Growing Period (LGP) and the AEZ classification of the African continent. Farmers' decisions are obtained from the World Bank household surveys of around 8000 farms across 9 sub-Saharan countries. The AEZ results are compared with the observed behavioral decisions of the farmers as well as future predictions of behaviors. Observed choices of agricultural systems, crop net revenues, distributions of livestock species, and grain yields are compared with the AEZ classification. This paper finds that the AEZ/LGP classification identifies the land's suitability for crop farming well, but is a poor indicator of livestock systems, both specialized and diversified. It also does a poor job of identifying nonmajor grains such as forest activities. Besides these identification issues, adaptive decisions such as diversification and risk management are difficult to capture by the AEZ methods. These problems become evident when the AEZ method is applied to measure the impacts of future climate changes since the shifts of farming behaviors are hard to measure. Future research is needed to improve the classification of agro eco-systems and to develop an improved integrated analysis of ecological sciences and economics.
机译:本文评估了农业生态区(AEZ)的方法,以了解农业并通过观察到的撒哈拉以南非洲地区的农业决策来衡量气候变化对农业的影响。农业生态区(AEZ)方法使用生长期长度(LGP)和非洲大陆的AEZ分类进行了解释。农民的决定是从世界银行对9个撒哈拉以南国家的8000个农场进行的家庭调查中获得的。将AEZ的结果与观察到的农民的行为决策以及未来的行为预测进行比较。将观察到的农业系统选择,作物净收入,牲畜物种分布和粮食产量与AEZ分类进行比较。本文发现,AEZ / LGP分类能够很好地确定该土地是否适合农作物耕作,但对于专业化和多样化的牲畜系统而言,这是一个较差的指标。在识别非主要谷物(例如森林活动)方面,也做得很差。除了这些识别问题之外,AEZ方法还难以捕获诸如多元化和风险管理之类的自适应决策。当采用AEZ方法来衡量未来气候变化的影响时,这些问题就变得很明显,因为农业行为的变化很难衡量。需要进行进一步的研究以改善农业生态系统的分类,并发展对生态科学和经济学的改进的综合分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号