...
首页> 外文期刊>European Heart Journal: The Journal of the European Society of Cardiology >Long-term clinical effects of ventricular pacing reduction with a changeover mode to minimize ventricular pacing in a general pacemaker population
【24h】

Long-term clinical effects of ventricular pacing reduction with a changeover mode to minimize ventricular pacing in a general pacemaker population

机译:降低心律起搏的长期临床效果,并采用转换模式以最大程度地减少一般起搏器人群的心律起搏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Right ventricular pacing (VP) has been hypothesized to increase the risk in heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The ANSWER study evaluated, whether an AAI-DDD changeover mode to minimize VP (SafeR) improves outcome compared with DDD in a general dual-chamber pacemaker population. ANSWER was a randomized controlled multicentre trial assessing SafeR vs. standard DDD in sinus node disease (SND) or AV and results block (AVB) patients. After a 1-month run-in period, they were randomized (1:1) and followed for 3 years. Pre-specified co-primary end-points were VP and the composite of hospitalization for HF, AF, or cardioversion. Pre-specified secondary end-points were cardiac death or HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular hospitalizations. ANSWER enrolled 650 patients (52.0% SND, 48% AVB) at 43 European centres and randomized in SafeR (n = 314) or DDD (n = 318). The SafeR mode showed a significant decrease in VP compared with DDD (11.5 vs. 93.6%, P < 0.0001 at 3 years). Deaths and syncope did not differ between randomization arms. No significant difference between groups [HR = 0.78; 95% Cl (0.48-1.25); P = 0.30] was found in the time to event of the co-primary composite of hospitalization for HF, AF, or cardioversion, nor in the individual components. SafeR showed a 51% risk reduction (RR) in experiencing cardiac death or HF hospitalization [HR = 0.49; 95% Cl (0.27-0.90); P = 0.02] and 30% RR in experiencing cardiovascular hospitalizations [HR = 0.70; 95% Cl (0.49-1.00); P = 0.05]. SafeR safely and significantly reduced VP in a general pacemaker population though had no effect on hospitalization for HF, AF, or cardioversion, when compared with DDD.
机译:假设右心室起搏(VP)可增加心力衰竭(HF)和房颤(AF)的风险。 ANSWER研究评估了在一般的双室起搏器人群中,与DDD相比,最小化VP(SafeR)的AAI-DDD转换模式是否改善了预后。 ANSWER是一项随机对照的多中心试验,评估窦房结病(SND)或AV和结果阻滞(AVB)患者的SafeR与标准DDD。经过1个月的磨合期后,将它们随机分配(1:1),然后随访3年。预先指定的主要共同终点是VP和HF,AF或心脏复律住院治疗的组合。预先指定的次要终点是心源性死亡或心衰住院和心血管疾病住院。 ANSWER在欧洲的43个中心招募了650名患者(52.0%SND,48%AVB),并随机分配到SafeR(n = 314)或DDD(n = 318)中。与DDD相比,SafeR模式显示VP显着降低(3年时为11.5对93.6%,P <0.0001)。两组间的死亡和晕厥无差异。两组之间无显着差异[HR = 0.78; 95%氯(0.48-1.25);在发生因HF,AF或心脏复律住院的主要联合事件发生的时间,也未在各个组成部分中发现P = 0.30]。 SafeR在发生心源性死亡或心衰住院时显示出51%的风险降低(RR)[HR = 0.49; 95%Cl(0.27-0.90); P = 0.02]和30%RR在经历心血管疾病住院期间[HR = 0.70; 95%氯(0.49-1.00); P = 0.05]。与DDD相比,SafeR安全且显着降低了一般起搏器人群的VP,尽管对HF,AF或心脏复律的住院没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号