首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Does affirmative action reduce gender discrimination and enhance efficiency? New experimental evidence
【24h】

Does affirmative action reduce gender discrimination and enhance efficiency? New experimental evidence

机译:平等权利行动是否会减少性别歧视并提高效率?新的实验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We investigate experimentally the impact of quota policies on gender discrimination in hiring decisions by testing whether affirmative action increases female employment. We also ask whether firm performance is affected by such policies. Our experiment consists of three treatments. In the baseline (no quota) treatment, groups of two employers and six potential job candidates are formed. Employers have to hire two workers based on information on candidate characteristics including gender and years and subject of study. The second, low penalty, treatment is identical to the baseline except there is a quota such that at least half of the employees hired must be women. If this quota is not respected, the firm has to pay a penalty. The last, high penalty, treatment is the same as the low penalty treatment except that the penalty is significantly higher. We find that women are ranked unfavorably in the absence of a quota, and the introduction of a quota significantly reduces gender discrimination. Firm performance is not affected by the introduction of quotas. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们通过测试平等权利行动是否增加了女性就业,实验性地研究了配额政策对性别歧视在雇用决策中的影响。我们还询问公司的业绩是否受到此类政策的影响。我们的实验包括三种治疗方法。在基准(无配额)待遇中,组成了两个雇主和六个潜在工作候选人的小组。雇主必须根据有关候选人特征的信息(包括性别,年龄和学习主题)雇用两名工人。第二种低刑罚待遇与基准待遇相同,不同之处在于有配额规定,雇用的雇员中至少有一半必须是女性。如果不遵守此配额,则该公司必须支付罚款。最后的高罚分处理与低罚分处理相同,只是罚分明显更高。我们发现,在没有配额的情况下,妇女的排名不利,配额的引入大大减少了性别歧视。公司绩效不受配额引入的影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号