首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Formula apportionment vs. separate accounting: A private information perspective
【24h】

Formula apportionment vs. separate accounting: A private information perspective

机译:公式分配与单独会计:私人信息视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2002, the European Commission recommended that member countries use formula apportionment procedures to tax multinational companies. This departure from the standard separate accounting (transfer pricing) approach is an attempt to reduce the costsand distortions associated with auditing transfer prices. Unfortunately, apportionment formulas create their own economic distortions and, contrary to popular belief, they do not eliminate distortions due to asymmetric information between the multinational and the national tax authorities. In this paper, I explicitly model the role of private information in two tax competition games: one in which tax liabilities are calculated under formula apportionment and one in which tax liabilities are calculated under separate accounting and transfer prices are audited. Switching to a formula apportionment system affects the after-tax profit of multinationals and the tax revenues paid by both domestic and foreign firms. The direction and magnitude of the changesdepend on the accuracy of the auditing technology and non-monotonically on multinational costs. The switch will have different effects on the tax receipts from domestic and foreign firms.
机译:2002年,欧洲委员会建议成员国使用公式分摊程序对跨国公司征税。偏离标准的单独会计(转移定价)方法是一种尝试,以减少与审计转移价格相关的成本和失真。不幸的是,分配公式会造成其自身的经济扭曲,并且与普遍的看法相反,它们无法消除由于跨国公司与国家税务机关之间信息不对称而造成的扭曲。在本文中,我明确地建模了私人信息在两个税收竞争博弈中的作用:一个在公式分摊法下计算税收负债,另一个在单独的会计法下计算税收负债并审核转让价格。转换为公式分配系统会影响跨国公司的税后利润以及国内外公司支付的税收。变更的方向和幅度取决于审计技术的准确性,而不取决于跨国公司的成本。转换将对国内外公司的税收产生不同的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号