首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Prices vs. quantities: Public finance and the choice of regulatory instruments
【24h】

Prices vs. quantities: Public finance and the choice of regulatory instruments

机译:价格与数量:公共财政和监管手段的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since Montgomery [1972. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory 5, 395-418] and Weitzman [1974. Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies 41, 477-491], it has generally been assumed that, in a full-information setting, tradable quotas and taxes are equivalent regulatory instruments. We demonstrate that, if the government is movitated by public-finance concerns, this equivalence holds only if quotas are short lived. Moreover, the government prefers quotas with the shortest possible lifetime, or, what is equivalent in our setting, taxes.
机译:自蒙哥马利[1972。许可证市场和有效的污染控制计划。经济理论杂志5,395-418]和魏茨曼[1974。价格与数量。 《经济研究评论》,第41卷,第477-491页],通常认为,在完整的信息环境中,可交易的配额和税收是等效的监管工具。我们证明,如果政府出于公共财政的考虑而受到鼓舞,那么只有在配额短暂的情况下这种对等才成立。此外,政府更倾向于使用寿命最短的配额,或者在我们的环境中相当于税收。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号