...
首页> 外文期刊>Eurasian geography and economics >'Crimea Is Ours!' Russian popular geopolitics in the new media age
【24h】

'Crimea Is Ours!' Russian popular geopolitics in the new media age

机译:“克里米亚是我们的!”新媒体时代的俄罗斯流行地缘政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyzes how the Russian annexation of Crimea in March 2014 has been represented and discussed on social networks. It argues that the key metaphors and discursive strategies, which have been developed in the digital environment, have been prefigured in Russian geopolitical culture and popular imagination since Crimea's first accession to Russia in 1783. The central geopolitical trope of Crimea as either a "metonymy" of the empire or its "alter ego" reverberates in today's online discussions. Engaging with the debates on the political potential of the Russian "blogosphere," the article comes to conclusions that Russian "digital geopolitics" tries to foster grass-roots activism but at the same time paradoxically disempowers them. The government's project to mobilize people's support of its policy in Ukraine lies at the core of this failure. Using geopolitical rhetoric and the tongue-in-cheek criticism of the Western liberal model, the state inhibits the development of people's political subjectivity, undermines the belief in their ability to comprehend and influence the "great geopolitical game," and nurtures the culture of corrosive irony toward any master-narrative, the Kremlin's one included.
机译:本文分析了如何在社交网络上代表和讨论2014年3月俄罗斯对克里米亚的吞并。它辩称,自从克里米亚于1783年首次加入俄罗斯以来,在数字环境中发展的关键隐喻和话语策略已经预示于俄罗斯地缘政治文化和大众的想象力中。在今天的在线讨论中,这个帝国或它的“自我”的回响回荡了。在讨论有关俄罗斯“边界圈”的政治潜力的辩论时,文章得出的结论是,俄罗斯的“数字地缘政治”试图培育基层行动主义,但与此同时却矛盾地取消了他们的权力。政府动员民众支持其乌克兰政策的项目是这一失败的核心。国家使用地缘政治言论和对西方自由主义模式的嘲讽批评,抑制了人民政治主观性的发展,破坏了人们理解和影响“伟大的地缘政治博弈”能力的信念,并培育了腐蚀性文化具有讽刺意味的是,对任何大师级的叙述,包括克里姆林宫的叙述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号