首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >Counterpoint: Is there a need for supplemental XRT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients?
【24h】

Counterpoint: Is there a need for supplemental XRT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients?

机译:观点:中危前列腺癌患者是否需要补充XRT?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Permanent brachytherapy has become an accepted modality for treating localized prostate cancer. Low-risk disease can be managed with seed implant monotherapy and high-risk disease with a combination of seeds and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without hormone therapy (HT). Treatment of the intermediate-risk group (IRG) remains controversial. Is monotherapy or combination treatment the best option? To make the case for monotherapy adequate radiation dose needs to be delivered. In addition to cancer control, differences between monotherapy and combination therapy in morbidity, secondary cancer (SC) risk, and costs also need to be addressed.
机译:永久性近距离放射治疗已成为治疗局部前列腺癌的公认方法。可以采用种子植入物单一疗法来治疗低危疾病,而采用种子和外部放射线疗法(EBRT)结合或不结合激素疗法(HT)可以治疗高危疾病。中危组(IRG)的治疗仍存在争议。单一疗法或联合疗法是最佳选择吗?为了进行单药治疗,需要提供足够的放射剂量。除了控制癌症外,还需要解决单一疗法和联合疗法在发病率,继发性癌症(SC)风险和费用方面的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号