首页> 外文期刊>Ethology >Female-Biased Helping in a Cooperatively Breeding Bird: Female Benefits or Male Costs
【24h】

Female-Biased Helping in a Cooperatively Breeding Bird: Female Benefits or Male Costs

机译:雌性协助合作繁殖的鸟类:雌性收益或雄性成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is often a sex bias in helping effort in cooperatively breeding species with both male and female helpers, and yet this phenomenon is still poorly understood. Although sex-biased helping is often assumed to be correlated with sex-specific benefits, sex-specific costs could also be responsible for sex-biased helping. Cooperatively breeding brown jays (Cyanocorax morio) in Monteverde, Costa Rica have helpers of both sexes and dispersal is male-biased, a rare reversal of the female-biased dispersal pattern often seen in birds. We quantified helper contributions to nestling care and analyzed whether there was sex-biased helping and if so, whether it was correlated with known benefits derived via helping. Brown jay helpers provided over 70% of all nestling feedings, but they did not appear to decrease the workload of breeders across the range of observed group sizes. Female helpers fed nestlings and engaged in vigilance at significantly higher levels than male helpers. Nonetheless, female helpers did not appear to gain direct benefits, either through current reproduction or group augmentation, or indirect fitness benefits from helping during the nestling stage. While it is possible that females could be accruing subtle future direct benefits such as breeding experience or alliance formation from helping, future studies should focus on whether the observed sex bias in helping is because males decrease their care relative to females in order to pursue extra-territorial forays. Explanations for sex-biased helping in cooperative breeders are proving to be as varied as those proposed for helping behavior in general, suggesting that it will often be necessary to quantify a wide range of benefits and costs when seeking explanations for sex-biased helping.
机译:在与男性和女性帮助者合作繁殖物种的帮助工作中,通常存在性别偏见,但是这种现象仍然知之甚少。尽管通常认为基于性别的帮助与特定于性别的收益相关,但是基于性别的成本也可能导致基于性别的帮助。在哥斯达黎加的蒙特维德,合作繁殖棕色松鸦(Cyanocorax morio)有两性的帮手,而且男性偏向于分散,这是鸟类偏见于女性偏向的分散模式的一种罕见的逆转。我们量化了帮助者对雏鸟护理的贡献,并分析了是否存在性别偏见的帮助,如果存在,是否与通过帮助而获得的已知收益相关。棕色松鸦助手占所有雏鸟喂养的70%以上,但在观察到的群体规模范围内,它们似乎并未减少育种者的工作量。女佣人喂养雏鸟并保持警惕,其水平明显高于男佣人。但是,女佣似乎并没有通过当前的繁殖或群体扩大而获得直接收益,也没有在雏鸟阶段获得间接的健身收益。尽管女性可能会从帮助中获得微妙的未来直接收益,例如育种经验或结盟,但未来的研究应侧重于观察到的帮助中的性别偏见是否是因为男性相对于女性而言减少了照料,从而追求额外的收入。领土突袭。事实证明,合作育种者对性别偏见的解释与针对一般行为举止所提出的解释不尽相同,这表明在寻求针对性别偏见的解释时,通常有必要量化各种收益和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号