首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsia: Journal of the International League against Epilepsy >Efficacy and safety of pregabalin versus levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures: A randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of pregabalin versus levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures: A randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial

机译:普瑞巴林与左乙拉西坦作为部分发作的辅助治疗的有效性和安全性:一项随机,双盲,非劣效性试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of pregabalin and levetiracetam for the reduction of seizure frequency in patients with partial seizures. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, parallel-group noninferiority study of pregabalin and levetiracetam (randomized 1:1) as adjunctive treatment in adult patients with refractory partial seizures. The study included a 6-week baseline phase, 4-week dose-escalation phase, and 12-week maintenance phase. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥50% reduction in 28-day seizure rate during the 12-week maintenance phase, as compared with baseline. Noninferiority of pregabalin was declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in responder rates was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -12%. A key secondary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in 28-day seizure rate during the dose-escalation and maintenance phases. Results Five hundred nine patients were randomized to pregabalin (n = 254) or levetiracetam (n = 255) and 418 (208 pregabalin, 210 levetiracetam) completed the maintenance phase. With both pregabalin and levetiracetam, the proportion of patients with a ≥50% reduction in 28-day seizure rate was 0.59 (difference between groups [95% CI], 0.00 [-0.08 to 0.09]). Because the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -12%, pregabalin was not inferior to levetiracetam. There was no significant difference between pregabalin and levetiracetam in the percent change in 28-day seizure rate (median difference [95% CI], 4.1 [-2.6 to 10.9], p = 0.3571). In a post hoc analysis, the proportion of patients who were seizure-free for the maintenance phase was lower with pregabalin (8.4%) than with levetiracetam (16.2%), p = 0.0155. Safety profiles were similar and consistent with prior trials. Significance These results indicate that pregabalin is noninferior, and has a similar tolerability, to levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy in reducing seizure frequency in patients with partial seizures. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.
机译:目的评估普瑞巴林和左乙拉西坦在部分性癫痫发作中减少癫痫发作频率的相对疗效和安全性。方法这是一项普瑞巴林和左乙拉西坦(1:1随机分配)作为成人难治性部分性癫痫的辅助治疗的随机,双盲,灵活剂量,平行分组的非劣效性研究。该研究包括6周的基线期,4周的剂量递增期和12周的维持期。主要终点是与基线相比,在维持12周的阶段中28天癫痫发作率降低≥50%的患者比例。如果应答率差异的95%置信区间(CI)的下限大于预先规定的-12%的非劣效性界限,则表明普瑞巴林的非劣效性。关键的次要终点是剂量递增和维持阶段28天癫痫发作率与基线相比的百分比变化。结果509例患者被随机分配至普瑞巴林(n = 254)或左乙拉西坦(n = 255),而418名(普瑞巴林(208 pregabalin,210左乙拉西坦))完成了维持期。普瑞巴林和左乙拉西坦联合使用时,28天癫痫发作率降低≥50%的患者比例为0.59(组间差异[95%CI],0.00 [-0.08至0.09])。由于95%CI的下限大于预先规定的-12%的非劣效性,因此普瑞巴林不逊于左乙拉西坦。普瑞巴林和左乙拉西坦在28天癫痫发作百分率变化上无显着差异(中位数差异[95%CI],4.1 [-2.6至10.9],p = 0.3571)。在事后分析中,在维持阶段无癫痫发作的患者中,普瑞巴林(8.4%)低于左乙拉西坦(16.2%),p = 0.0155。安全性概况相似并且与先前的试验一致。意义这些结果表明,普瑞巴林在降低部分性癫痫患者的癫痫发作频率方面作为辅助治疗与左乙拉西坦相当,并且具有相似的耐受性。可以在此处的“支持信息”部分中下载概述本文的PowerPoint幻灯片。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号