首页> 外文期刊>Equine Veterinary Journal >Scintigraphic comparison of intra-arterial injection and distal intravenous regional limb perfusion for administration of mesenchymal stem cells to the equine foot
【24h】

Scintigraphic comparison of intra-arterial injection and distal intravenous regional limb perfusion for administration of mesenchymal stem cells to the equine foot

机译:动脉内注射和远端静脉区域性肢体灌注治疗马足间充质干细胞的闪烁扫描法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reasons for performing study Intra-arterial (i.a.) and intravenous (i.v.) regional limb perfusions (RLP) through the median artery and cephalic vein, respectively, have been previously investigated for administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to the equine distal limb. Limitations due to thrombosis of the arteries after i.a. RLP and poor distribution of MSCs to the foot with i.v. RLP were observed. These techniques need to be modified for clinical use. Objectives Evaluate the distribution, uptake and persistence of radiolabelled MSCs after i.a. injection through the median artery without a tourniquet and after i.v. RLP through the lateral palmar digital vein. Study design In vivo experimental study. Methods 99mTc-HMPAO-labelled MSCs were injected through the median artery of one limb and the lateral palmar digital vein of the other limb of 6 horses under general anaesthesia. No tourniquet was used for the i.a. injection. A pneumatic tourniquet was placed on the metacarpus for i.v. injection. Scintigraphic images were obtained up to 24h after injection. Results Intra-arterial injection resulted in MSCs retention within the limb despite the absence of a tourniquet and no thrombosis was observed. Both i.a. injection and i.v. RLP led to distribution of MSCs to the foot. The i.a. injection resulted in a more homogeneous distribution. The MSC uptake was higher with i.v. RLP at the initial timepoints, but no significant difference was present at 24h. Conclusions Both i.a. injection through the median artery without a tourniquet and i.v. RLP performed through the lateral palmar digital vein under general anaesthesia are safe and reliable methods for administration of MSCs to the equine foot. The i.a. technique is preferred owing to the better distribution, but is technically more challenging. The feasibility of performing these techniques on standing horses remains to be investigated
机译:进行研究的原因先前已经研究过分别通过正中动脉和头静脉进行动脉内(i.a.)和静脉内(i.v.)局部肢体灌注(RLP),以向马的远端肢体施用间充质干细胞(MSCs)。术后因动脉血栓形成造成的局限性RLP和i.v.使MSC分布不佳观察到RLP。这些技术需要修改以用于临床。目的评估经i.a处理后的放射性标记MSC的分布,摄取和持久性。在没有止血带的情况下并且在静脉内注射后通过正中动脉进行注射RLP通过手掌外侧指静脉。研究设计体内实验研究。方法在全麻下,通过6只马的一只肢体的中动脉和另一只肢体的掌侧外侧静脉注射99mTc-HMPAO标记的MSC。没有止血带用于i.a.注射。将气动止血带放在掌骨上进行静脉输注。注射。注射后直至24h均获得闪烁图像。结果尽管没有止血带,但动脉内注射导致MSCs保留在肢体内,未观察到血栓形成。两者都是注射和静脉注射RLP导致MSC分布到脚部。 i.a.注射导致更均匀的分布。 i.v.的MSC摄取更高。 RLP在初始时间点出现,但在24h时没有明显差异。结论两者不用止血带和静脉注射通过正中动脉注射在全身麻醉下通过手掌外侧指静脉进行RLP是向马脚施用MSC的安全可靠的方法。 i.a.由于分布更好,因此首选技术,但在技术上更具挑战性。在立马上实施这些技术的可行性仍有待研究

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号