首页> 外文期刊>Equine Veterinary Journal >Use of proxy measurements of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretory response to distinguish between normal and previously laminitic ponies
【24h】

Use of proxy measurements of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretory response to distinguish between normal and previously laminitic ponies

机译:使用代理测量胰岛素敏感性和胰岛素分泌反应来区分正常和先前的小马

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Reasons for performing study: Insulin resistance may be a risk factor for pasture-associated laminitis. Diagnosis of insulin resistance could help identify individuals at increased risk of laminitis. Objective: To calculate proxy measurements of insulin sensitivity (reciprocal of the square root of insulin: RISQI and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: QUICKI) and insulin secretory response (modified insulin-to-glucose ratio: MIRG) based on basal glucose and insulin concentrations in normal (NP) and previously laminitic (PLP) ponies. Methods: Proxies were calculated in 7 NP and 5 PLP from 20 separate measurements of insulin and glucose taken in spring, summer and winter when ponies were adapted to eating either pasture or hay. Proxies were RISQI: Insulin-0.5, QUICKI: 1/(log[fasting Insulin]+ log[fasting Glucose]) and MIRG: (800-0.3 x [Insulin-50]2)/[Glucose-30]. A modified insulin-to-glucose ratio for ponies (MIGRP) was investigated using: (3000-0.012 x[Insulin-500]2)/[Glucose-30]. Statistical analysis used linear mixed models. Results: Diet did not significantly affect measurements, so values were pooled for further analysis. RISQI (mean +/- s.d.) was lower in PLP (0.26 +/- 0.15 [mu/l]-0.5) than NP (0.29 +/- 0.12 [mu/l]-0.5; P = 0.05). QUICKI was lower in PLP (0.31 +/- 0.05) than NP (0.33 +/- 0.04; P = 0.047). There was no difference in MIRG between NP and PLP. MIGRP (median [interquartile range]) was greater in PLP (4.0 [7.9][muins]2/10 center dot l center dot mggluc) than NP (2.6 [3.2][muins]2/10 center dot l center dot mggluc; P = 0.022). In spring, NP had higher RISQI and QUICKI and lower MIGRP than PLP (P<0.001). In PLP, RISQI and QUICKI were higher in summer than spring (P<0.02) and MIGRP was lower in summer than other seasons (P<0.01). In NP, RISQI, QUICKI and MIGRP were each different between seasons (P<0.017). MIRG did not vary with season. Conclusions: RISQI, QUICKI and MIGRP, but not MIRG, differentiated between NP and PLP. None of the proxies accurately identified individual PLP. Seasonal changes in insulin sensitivity and insulin secretory response were apparent. Potential relevance: Current proxy measurements cannot determine an individual's laminitis susceptibility. MIGRP may be useful in hyperinsulinaemic animals.
机译:进行研究的原因:胰岛素抵抗可能是牧场相关性椎板炎的危险因素。胰岛素抵抗的诊断可以帮助识别罹患椎板炎风险增加的个体。目的:根据基础葡萄糖和胰岛素浓度,计算胰岛素敏感性(胰岛素平方根的倒数:RISQI和定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数:QUICKI)和胰岛素分泌反应(改良的胰岛素与葡萄糖比率:MIRG)的代理测量值在正常(NP)和先前的小脑(PLP)小马中。方法:在春季,夏季和冬季分别测量小马适合吃草或干草的20种胰岛素和葡萄糖的测量值,分别以7 NP和5 PLP计算代理。代理是RISQI:胰岛素-0.5,QUICKI:1 /(log [禁食胰岛素] + log [禁食葡萄糖])和MIRG:(800-0.3×[Insulin-50] 2)/ [葡萄糖-30]。使用(3000-0.012 x [Insulin-500] 2)/ [Glucose-30]研究了小马的改良胰岛素与葡萄糖比率(MIGRP)。统计分析使用线性混合模型。结果:饮食对测量没有显着影响,因此汇总了数值以进行进一步分析。 PLP(0.26 +/- 0.15μ/ l-0.5)的RISQI(平均+/- s.d.)低于NP(0.29 +/- 0.12μ/ l-0.5; P = 0.05)。 QUICKI在PLP(0.31 +/- 0.05)中低于NP(0.33 +/- 0.04; P = 0.047)。 NP和PLP之间的MIRG没有差异。 PLP(4.0 [7.9]μins2/10中心点l中心点mggluc)中的MIGRP(中位[四分位数范围])大于NP(2.6 [3.2]μins] 2/10中心点l中心点mggluc; P = 0.022)。春季,NP的RISQI和QUICKI较高,而MIGRP低于PLP(P <0.001)。在PLP中,夏季的RISQI和QUICKI高于春季(P <0.02),夏季的MIGRP低于其他季节(P <0.01)。在NP中,RISQI,QUICKI和MIGRP在每个季节之间都不同(P <0.017)。 MIRG没有随季节变化。结论:RISQI,QUICKI和MIGRP(而非MIRG)可区分NP和PLP。没有一个代理可以准确地识别单个PLP。胰岛素敏感性和胰岛素分泌反应的季节性变化很明显。潜在相关性:当前的替代指标无法确定个人的椎板炎敏感性。 MIGRP可能在高胰岛素血症动物中有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号