首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >Dosimetric comparison of optimization methods for multichannel intracavitary brachytherapy for superficial vaginal tumors
【24h】

Dosimetric comparison of optimization methods for multichannel intracavitary brachytherapy for superficial vaginal tumors

机译:阴道浅表肿瘤多通道腔内近距离放射治疗优化方法的剂量学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Multichannel vaginal applicators allow treatment of a more conformal volume compared with a single, central vaginal channel. There are several optimization methods available for use with multichannel applicators, but no previous comparison of these has been performed in the treatment of superficial vaginal tumors. Accordingly, a feasibility study was completed to compare inverse planning by simulated annealing (IPSA), dose point optimization (DPO), and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy using a multichannel, intracavitary vaginal cylinder. Methods and Materials: This comparative study used CT data sets from five patients with superficial vaginal recurrences of endometrial cancer treated with multichannel intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Treatment plans were generated using DPO, graphical optimization, surface optimization with IPSA (surf IPSA), and two plans using volume optimization with IPSA. The plans were evaluated for target coverage, conformal index, dose homogeneity index, and dose to organs at risk. Results: Best target coverage was achieved by volume optimization with IPSA 2 and surf IPSA with mean V100 values of 93.89% and 91.87%, respectively. Doses for the most exposed 2-cm3 of the bladder (bladder D2cc) was within tolerance for all optimization methods. Rectal D2cc was above tolerance for one DPO plan. All volume optimization with IPSA plans resulted in higher vaginal mucosa doses for all patients. Greatest homogeneity within the target volume was seen with surf IPSA and DPO. Highest conformal indices were seen with surf IPSA and graphical optimization. Conclusions: Optimization with surf IPSA was user friendly for the generation of treatment plans and achieved good target coverage, conformity, and homogeneity with acceptable doses to organs at risk.
机译:目的:与单条中央阴道通道相比,多通道阴道涂药器可以治疗更多的保形容积。有几种可用于多通道涂药器的优化方法,但是在浅表阴道肿瘤的治疗中尚未进行这些方法的比较。因此,完成了一项可行性研究,以比较通过模拟退火(IPSA),剂量点优化(DPO)和图形优化对使用多通道腔内阴道圆柱体进行高剂量率近距离治疗的逆计划。方法和材料:这项比较研究使用了5例经多腔腔内高剂量近距离放射治疗的子宫内膜癌浅表阴道复发患者的CT数据集。使用DPO,图形优化,使用IPSA(曲面IPSA)进行表面优化以及使用IPSA进行体积优化的两个计划生成了治疗计划。对计划的目标覆盖率,保形指数,剂量均一性指数以及对有风险器官的剂量进行了评估。结果:最佳目标覆盖率是通过使用IPSA 2和Surf IPSA进行体积优化实现的,V100的平均值分别为93.89%和91.87%。对于所有最优化方法,最暴露的2 cm3膀胱(膀胱D2cc)的剂量均在允许范围内。直肠D2cc高于一项DPO计划的公差。使用IPSA计划进行的所有体积优化均可为所有患者带来更高的阴道粘膜剂量。使用IPSA和DPO冲浪时,在目标体积内具有最大的同质性。通过IPSA冲浪和图形优化可以看到最高的保形指数。结论:冲浪IPSA的优化操作对用户友好,可用于制定治疗计划,并在可接受的风险器官剂量下达到了良好的靶标覆盖率,一致性和均一性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号