...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and molecular mutagenesis. >Intracellular and extracellular factors influencing Cr(VI and Cr(III) genotoxicity
【24h】

Intracellular and extracellular factors influencing Cr(VI and Cr(III) genotoxicity

机译:影响Cr(VI和Cr(III)遗传毒性的细胞内和细胞外因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cr(VI) is a human and animal carcinogen. Cr(VI) does not interact directly with DNA and thus its genotoxicity is attributed to its intracellular reduction to Cr(III) via reactive intermediates. The resulting types of DNA damage can be grouped into two categories: (1) oxidative DNA damage and (2) Cr(III)-DNA interactions. This study examines the molecular mechanism of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) genotoxicity in an intact cell. A system screening for DNA deletions (DEL assay) was used to compare induction of chromosomal rearrangements in the yeast Saccharomycescerevisiae following Cr(VI) and Cr(III) exposure. Both forms of chromium induced DNA deletions albeit with different dose-response curves. N-acetylcysteine had a protective effect against Cr(VI) genotoxicity at high exposure doses but had no protective effect at lower doses or against Cr(III). An oxidative DNA damage repair mutant was hypersensitive to Cr(VI) only at high exposure and the mutant was not hypersensitive to Cr(III) exposure. These data imply that oxidative stress is involved in Cr(VI) genotoxicity at high exposure concentrations and not so in Cr(III). The Cr(III)-DNA interaction appears to be an important genotoxic lesion following Cr(VI) exposure at low-exposure concentrations. The CAN forward mutation assay revealed that within the concentration ranges used for this study, Cr(III) does not cause point mutations and Cr(VI) causes a mild but statistically significant increase in point mutation only at the highest concentration tested. This study reveals that DNA deletions occurring as a result of intrachromosomal homologous recombination are a useful endpoint for studying chromium genotoxicity.
机译:六价铬是人类和动物的致癌物。 Cr(VI)不直接与DNA相互作用,因此其遗传毒性归因于其通过反应性中间体将其细胞内还原为Cr(III)。导致的DNA损伤类型可分为两类:(1)氧化性DNA损伤和(2)Cr(III)-DNA相互作用。这项研究检查了完整细胞中Cr(VI)和Cr(III)遗传毒性的分子机制。 DNA缺失的系统筛选(DEL分析)用于比较暴露于Cr(VI)和Cr(III)后酵母酿酒酵母中染色体重排的诱导。两种形式的铬诱导的DNA缺失,尽管具有不同的剂量反应曲线。 N-乙酰半胱氨酸在高剂量下对Cr(VI)的遗传毒性有保护作用,但在低剂量下或对Cr(III)则没有保护作用。氧化性DNA损伤修复突变体仅在高暴露下对Cr(VI)敏感,而突变体对Cr(III)暴露则不敏感。这些数据表明,氧化应激与高暴露浓度下的Cr(VI)遗传毒性有关,而与Cr(III)无关。在低浓度暴露于Cr(VI)后,Cr(III)-DNA相互作用似乎是重要的遗传毒性损伤。 CAN正向突变分析表明,在本研究使用的浓度范围内,Cr(III)不会引起点突变,而Cr(VI)仅在最高测试浓度下会引起点突变的轻微但统计学上显着的增加。这项研究表明,染色体内同源重组导致的DNA缺失是研究铬遗传毒性的有用终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号