首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Ecology >Benefits of drip irrigation and constraints in drip irrigation adoption in Dharwad district of Northern Karnataka.
【24h】

Benefits of drip irrigation and constraints in drip irrigation adoption in Dharwad district of Northern Karnataka.

机译:卡纳塔克邦北部Dharwad地区滴灌的好处和采用滴灌的制约因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The study was conducted in Dharwad district of Northern Karnataka to assess the benefits of drip irrigation and constraints in drip irrigation adoption revealed that, the increase in fruit yield in drip irrigation over surface method of irrigation was 29.48, 29.37 and 31.30% in small, medium and large farmers respectively. The water saved in drip irrigation over surface method of irrigation was 46.32, 43.12 and 45.48% in small, medium and large farmers respectively. The decrease in expenditure on irrigation in drip over surface method was 39.80, 35.28 and 33.25% in small, medium and large farmers respectively. The decrease in expenditure on weed control in drip irrigation over surface method of irrigation was 43.41, 42.16 and 35.41% in small, medium and large farmers respectively. The decrease in expenditure on fertilizer application in drip irrigation over surface method of irrigation was 41.35, 37.41 and 35.19% in small, medium and large farmers respectively. The 100.00, 98.86, 87.50, 80.68, 87.50, 80.68, 78.41, 73.86, 71.59, 69.32 and 64.77% of drip irrigation farmers were having constraints like complicated procedures in getting loan, delay in sanction of loan, non availability of soluble fertilizers, inadequate supply of electricity, choking of laterals and drippers, initial investment is high, inadequate follow up services by drip agencies, non-availability of quality materials and rodents damage to the laterals respectively.
机译:该研究在北卡纳塔克邦的Dharwad地区进行,以评估滴灌的好处和采用滴灌的制约因素,结果表明,在小,中型灌溉中,滴灌比地面灌溉的水果产量增加了29.48%,29.37和31.30%。和大农场主。小,中,大型农户滴灌地表水节水分别为46.32、43.12和45.48%。小,中,大型农民滴灌地表灌溉的支出分别减少了39.80%,35.28和33.25%。相比于地面灌溉,滴灌控制杂草的支出分别减少了43.41%,42.16%和35.41%,其中小,中,大型农户的减免费用最高。在小,中,大型农民中,滴灌施肥比地面灌溉减少了41.35%,37.41%和35.19%。 100.00、98.86、87.50、80.68、87.50、80.68、78.41、73.86、71.59、69.32和64.77%的滴灌农民受到限制,例如获得贷款的程序复杂,延迟批准贷款,无法使用可溶性肥料,不足电力供应,支管和滴头的堵塞,初期投资高,滴灌机构的后续服务不足,优质材料的缺乏以及啮齿动物对支管的损坏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号