首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Changing climate, changing frames: Dutch water policy frame developments in the context of a rise and fall of attention to climate change
【24h】

Changing climate, changing frames: Dutch water policy frame developments in the context of a rise and fall of attention to climate change

机译:变化的气候,变化的框架:在关注气候变化的兴衰背景下荷兰水政策框架的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Water management and particularly flood defence have a long history of collective action in low-lying countries like the Netherlands. The uncertain but potentially severe impacts of the recent climate change issue (e.g. sea level rise, extreme river discharges, salinisation) amplify the wicked and controversial character of flood safety policy issues. Policy proposals in this area generally involve drastic infrastructural works and long-term investments. They face the difficult challenge of framing problems and solutions in a publicly acceptable manner in ever changing circumstances. In this paper, we analyse and compare (1) how three key policy proposals publicly frame the flood safety issue, (2) the knowledge referred to in the framing and (3) how these frames are rhetorically connected or disconnected as statements in a long-term conversation. We find that (1) framings of policy proposals differ in the way they depict the importance of climate change, the relevant timeframe and the appropriate governance mode; (2) knowledge is selectively mobilised to underpin the different frames and (3) the frames about these proposals position themselves against the background of the previous proposals through rhetorical connections and disconnections. Finally, we discuss how this analysis hints at the importance of processes of powering and puzzling that lead to particular framings towards the public at different historical junctures.
机译:在荷兰这样的低洼国家,水管理,尤其是防洪,具有悠久的集体行动历史。最近的气候变化问题所带来的不确定但潜在的严重影响(例如海平面上升,极端河流排放,盐碱化)加剧了洪水安全政策问题的邪恶和有争议的特征。该领域的政策建议通常涉及大量的基础设施建设和长期投资。他们面临着艰巨的挑战,即在不断变化的环境中以公开接受的方式来制定问题和解决方案。在本文中,我们分析和比较(1)三个关键的政策建议如何公开构架洪水安全问题,(2)框架中提到的知识,以及(3)长期如何用言辞将这些构架联系起来或断开联系。对话。我们发现(1)政策建议的框架在描述气候变化的重要性,相关的时限和适当的治理模式方面有所不同; (2)有选择地动员知识来支撑不同的框架,并且(3)有关这些建议的框架通过修辞联系和脱节而在先前提议的背景下定位。最后,我们讨论了这种分析如何暗示权力和困惑过程的重要性,这些过程导致在不同的历史关头形成针对公众的特定框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号