...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Practice >Food Availability and the Food Desert Frame in Detroit: An Overview of the City's Food System
【24h】

Food Availability and the Food Desert Frame in Detroit: An Overview of the City's Food System

机译:底特律的食物供应和食物沙漠框架:城市食物系统概述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article takes a new approach to studying food access. It combines environmental justice analysis with systems thinking in an examination of the food environment of Detroit. The article reviews food access literature and identifies how each body of scholarship's underlying assumptions help or distort our understanding of urban food environments. The article argues for more comprehensive approaches to studying food access and demonstrates how such approaches can be implemented. We collected data from multiple sources, including ReferenceUSA, Orbis, and the Michigan Department of Agriculture, between 2011 and 2013 to build a database of food outlets in the city. We used SPSS 22 and ArcGIS 10.1 to analyze and map the data. The article analyzes the location of 3,499 food outlets in Detroit, comprising 34 categories food retailers, growers, supply chain, and food assistance programs. The study identified 96 supermarkets or full-line grocery stores; 1,110 small groceries, convenience stores, mini marts, and liquor stores; 279 specialty food stores; 306 pharmacies, dollar, and variety stores; 1,245 full-service and fast food restaurants and other food service outlets; 157 supply chain operations; 206 farms, community and school gardens, farmers' markets, and produce markets; and 100 food assistance programs. The article finds that though Detroit has areas that lack food outlets, the portrayal of the entire city as a "food desert" is misleading. Moreover, the traditional approach of food desert research of using only or primarily the presence or absence of supermarkets and full-line grocery stores to study food access ignores many important venues from which people obtain food. It also ignores the strategies people use to cope with food insecurity and their responses to limited food access.
机译:本文采用了一种研究食物获取的新方法。它在检查底特律的食品环境时将环境正义分析与系统思维相结合。本文回顾了粮食获取文献,并确定了每个奖学金的基本假设如何帮助或扭曲我们对城市粮食环境的理解。文章主张寻找更全面的方法来研究粮食获取​​,并说明如何实施这种方法。在2011年至2013年之间,我们从包括ReferenceUSA,Orbis和密歇根州农业部在内的多个来源收集了数据,以建立该市食品商店的数据库。我们使用SPSS 22和ArcGIS 10.1来分析和映射数据。本文分析了底特律3,499家食品商店的位置,其中包括34类食品零售商,种植者,供应链和食品援助计划。该研究确定了96家超市或全线杂货店。 1,110个小杂货店,便利店,迷你市场和酒类商店; 279家特色食品商店; 306家药店,美元及杂货店; 1,245个全方位服务的快餐店和其他食品服务网点; 157个供应链运作; 206个农场,社区和学校花园,农民市场和农产品市场;以及100个食品援助计划。这篇文章发现,尽管底特律的一些地区缺少食品出口,但是将整个城市描述为“食品沙漠”却具有误导性。而且,传统的食物荒漠研究方法只使用或主要使用是否存在超级市场和全线杂货店来研究食物获取,却忽略了人们获取食物的许多重要场所。它还忽略了人们用来应对粮食不安全的战略以及他们对有限的粮食获取的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号