首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Comparison of magnetic resonance enterodysis and capsule endoscopy with balloon-assisted enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bieeding
【24h】

Comparison of magnetic resonance enterodysis and capsule endoscopy with balloon-assisted enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bieeding

机译:不明消化道病患者磁共振小肠内镜和胶囊内镜与球囊辅助肠镜的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and study aims: New modalities are available for visualization of the small bowel in patients with possible obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), but their performance requires further comparison. This study compared the diagnostic yield of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and capsule endoscopy in patients with OGIB, using balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) as the reference standard. Patients and methods: Consecutive consenting patients who were referred for evaluation of OGIB were prospectively included. Patients underwent MRE followed by capsule endoscopy and BAE. Patients with high grade stenosis at MRE did not undergo capsule endoscopy. The reference standard was BAE findings in visualized small-bowel segments and expert panel consensus for segments not visualized during BAE.
机译:背景和研究目的:新的方法可用于可视化胃肠道出血(OGIB)患者的小肠显像,但其性能需要进一步比较。这项研究以气囊辅助肠镜(BAE)为参考标准,比较了OGIB患者的磁共振肠穿刺(MRE)和胶囊内镜的诊断率。患者和方法:前瞻性地包括被推荐接受OGIB评估的连续同意患者。患者接受MRE,然后进行胶囊内窥镜检查和BAE。 MRE高度狭窄的患者未接受胶囊内镜检查。参考标准是在可视化小肠段中的BAE发现,以及在BAE期间未可视化的段的专家小组共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号