...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Bispectral index monitoring of midazolam and propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized clinical trial (the EndoBIS study)
【24h】

Bispectral index monitoring of midazolam and propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized clinical trial (the EndoBIS study)

机译:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中咪达唑仑和丙泊酚镇静的双光谱指数监测:一项随机临床试验(EndoBIS研究)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring provides a non-invasive measure of the level of sedation. The purpose of this randomized, single-blind clinical trial was to evaluate whether BIS monitoring of sedation would lead to improved oxygenation and a reduced rate of cardiopulmonary complications during endoscopy. Patients and methods: Patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) under procedural sedation with a combination of low dose midazolam and propofol were randomly assigned to either standard monitoring of sedation only (BIS-blinded arm) or an open arm in which additional BIS monitoring was available (BIS-open arm). In the BIS-open arm, propofol administration was to be withheld if BIS values were <55.The primary study end point was the mean oxygen saturation per patient. Secondary end points were the rates of cardiopulmonary complications, propofol dose, quality of sedation (patient cooperation as rated by the endoscopist and patient satisfaction), and recovery. Results: A total of 144 patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mean oxygen saturation per patient was 97.7% in the BIS-open arm and 97.6% in the BIS-blinded arm (P=0.71). Total rates of cardiopulmonary complications, single numbers of hypoxemic, bradycardic, and hypotensive events, mean propofol doses, and quality of sedation also showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. However, BIS monitoring did result in faster recovery of patients as reflected by shorter times to eye opening (P=0.001), first verbal response (P=0.02), and leaving the procedure room (P<0.001). Conclusions: The use of additional BIS monitoring did not lead to improved oxygenation or a reduced rate of cardiopulmonary complications. Recovery times after the procedure were shorter than with standard monitoring alone, but the clinical benefit for daily practice may be limited.
机译:简介:双光谱指数(BIS)监视提供了镇静水平的非侵入性测量方法。这项随机,单盲临床试验的目的是评估BIS镇静监测是否会改善内窥镜检查期间的氧合程度并降低心肺并发症的发生率。患者和方法:将接受低剂量咪达唑仑和丙泊酚联合手术镇静的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的患者随机分配为仅进行镇静的标准监测(BIS盲法臂)或进行其他BIS监测的开放臂法可用(BIS张开臂)。在BIS开放组中,如果BIS值<55,则应停止使用异丙酚。主要研究终点是每位患者的平均氧饱和度。次要终点是心肺并发症的发生率,异丙酚剂量,镇静质量(内镜医师对患者的配合程度和患者满意度)以及恢复情况。结果:共有144例患者入选并纳入意向性治疗分析。 BIS开放组每名患者的平均氧饱和度为97.7%,BIS盲组为97.6%(P = 0.71)。在两组之间,心肺并发症的总发生率,低氧血症,心动过缓和降压事件的单一发生率,异丙酚的平均剂量和镇静质量也没有统计学差异。但是,BIS监测确实能使患者恢复得更快,这体现在缩短开眼时间(P = 0.001),首次口头反应(P = 0.02)和离开手术室(P <0.001)上。结论:使用额外的BIS监测并不能改善氧合或降低心肺并发症的发生率。手术后的恢复时间比单独进行标准监测的时间要短,但日常实践的临床获益可能有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号