首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP.
【24h】

Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP.

机译:ERCP中用于胆管插管的标准导管和可控导管的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare two steerable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) catheters with regard to speed and safety in cannulating the common bile duct.[nl] PATIENTS AND METHODS: A standard cannula, a short-nosed sphincterotome, and a bendable catheter were used. At two tertiary centres, a total of 312 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with one of three catheters and either by a trainee or an expert endoscopist. When cannulation failed, a further attempt was made with a different catheter. If this failed, a change in operator or other manoeuvres followed. The following were assessed: time to cholangiography and deep cannulation, number of attempts and success rates of cannulation, number of pancreatic duct injections, success of catheter cross-over, and complication rates.[nl] RESULTS: Both steerable catheters were significantly better for the initial cholangiogram than the standard catheter (standard catheter 75 %, bendable catheter 84 %, sphincterotome 88 %; P = 0.038), with no significant differences between the bendable catheter and the sphincterotome. Both were also better for deep cannulation of the bile duct (standard cannula 66 %, bendable catheter 69 %, sphincterotome 78 %; P = 0.15). When the standard catheter failed, a steerable catheter succeeded in 26 % of cases. Trainees experienced greater benefit from using steerable catheters. For experts, the bendable catheter was the quickest to achieve cholangiography and deep cannulation. Further manoeuvres had an 85-90 % success rate in allowing biliary access. Twenty of 23 needle-knife papillotomies (87 %) were successful when other methods had failed. The overall ERCP success rate was 97 %. Pancreatitis occurred in 5.3 % of cases.[nl] CONCLUSIONS: Steerable catheters allow faster access and can succeed when a standard catheter fails. If cannulation is difficult, changing the catheter should be considered at an early stage. Needle-knife papillotomy is a successful techniquein expert hands.
机译:背景与研究目的:本研究的目的是比较两种可控内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)导管在插入胆总管方面的速度和安全性。[nl]患者与方法:标准插管,短鼻括约肌切开术和弯曲导管被使用。在两个三级中心,共有312名患者被随机分配接受三个导管之一的治疗,并由受训者或专业内镜医师进行治疗。当插管失败时,将尝试使用其他导管。如果失败,则需要更改操作员或其他操作。评估以下内容:进行胆道造影和深层插管的时间,尝试的次数和成功率,胰管注射的次数,导管交叉的成功率和并发症发生率。[nl]结果:两种可控导管均显着改善了初始胆道造影比标准导管(标准导管75%,可弯曲导管84%,括约肌切开术88%; P = 0.038),可弯曲导管和括约肌切开术之间无显着差异。两者都对胆管深部插管效果更好(标准插管66%,可弯曲导管69%,括约肌切开器78%; P = 0.15)。当标准导管出现故障时,可操纵导管在26%的情况下成功。学员通过使用可操纵导管获得了更大的收益。对于专家而言,可弯曲导管是实现胆管造影和深层插管最快的方法。进一步的操作在允许胆道通畅方面具有85-90%的成功率。如果其他方法失败,则有23例中的20例(87%)是成功的。 ERCP总体成功率为97%。结论5.3%的患者发生胰腺炎。[nl]结论:可操纵的导管可加快进入速度,当标准导管失效时可成功。如果插管困难,应尽早考虑更换导管。针刀乳头切开术是专家手中的一项成功技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号