...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >How to justify endoscopic submucosal dissection in the Western world.
【24h】

How to justify endoscopic submucosal dissection in the Western world.

机译:如何在西方世界证明内镜下黏膜下剥离的合理性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Japan, endoscopic treatment is considered the treatment of choice for early gastroesophageal neoplasia. In the 1970 s, the high incidence of gastric cancer in Japan led to the initiation of screening programs, initially with double contrast studies and later with endoscopic inspection. As a result, the number of gastric and esophageal cancers detected at an early stage increased dramatically, and the endoscopic treatment of these early lesions evolved as a logical consequence. Initially early gastric and esophageal cancers were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques, of which the cap-based techniques are the most widely accepted [1]. These techniques suffer from the limitation that only lesions of a relatively small size can be resected in one piece (i.e., en bloc resection). Lesions larger than 15-20 mm generally require resection iimultiple pieces (i.e., piecemeal resection) [1 -4]. After piecemeal resection, however, it is difficult to assess the radicality at the resection margins. The radicality at the vertical resection margin can usually be adequately assessed, but since it is generally impossible to reconstruct the lesion from the resected specimens, radicality at the lateral resection margins can be uncertain.
机译:在日本,内镜治疗被认为是早期胃食管肿瘤的首选治疗方法。在1970年代,日本胃癌的高发导致了筛查计划的启动,最初是进行双重对比研究,后来进行了内窥镜检查。结果,在早期发现的胃癌和食道癌的数量急剧增加,并且对这些早期病变的内窥镜治疗逐渐发展成为必然的结果。最初,早期胃癌和食道癌采用内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)进行治疗,其中基于帽的技术是最广泛接受的[1]。这些技术的局限性在于,只能将一个相对较小的病灶一并切除(即整块切除)。大于15-20 mm的病变通常需要切除ii 多块(即,逐块切除)[1-4-]。但是,在零碎切除后,很难评估切除边缘的根治性。通常可以充分评估垂直切除边缘的根治性,但由于通常无法从切除的标本中重建病变,因此侧面切除边缘的根治性可能不确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号