首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.
【24h】

A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.

机译:上次内窥镜检查中单次穿刺活检钳的性能前瞻性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A single biopsy is usually obtained for each passage of a biopsy forceps. It was hypothesized that multiple bites per passage might improve the quantity and quality of tissue obtained, without significant artifacts. This hypothesis was tested in a prospective, pathologist-blinded study using different forceps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients who underwent elective upper endoscopy were included. Five different forceps were used in six different ways, varying in the number of bites taken per passage. Two pathologists, who were blinded to the type of biopsy forceps used, evaluated the specimens according to the parameters of maximum weight (mg), size of largest fragment (mm), depth, squash artifact, adequacy, and overall rating. RESULTS: A total of 240 biopsy specimens were obtained. The Microvasive Multibite and Megabite forceps obtained specimens with the maximum weight ( P < 0.05) and the largest size ( P < 0.05), respectively. Alligator forceps were able to obtain specimens significantly larger in size than the oval-shaped forceps ( P < 0.05). The Olympus FB-24K forceps performed best in both the adequacy score and the overall rating score ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Forceps with a needle, or the Multibite forceps, allow more biopsies to be taken per passage and improve the quality of tissues obtained. "Needleless" forceps can be used to obtain two samples per passage through the endoscope that are as good as when only one sample is collected. This approach can save time, and causes no significant damage to the biopsy specimens.
机译:背景和研究目的:通常每次活检钳的通过都要进行一次活检。据推测,每次通过多次叮咬可能会改善获得的组织的数量和质量,而不会产生明显的伪影。使用不同的镊子在一项前瞻性,病理学家盲目的研究中检验了该假设。患者和方法:包括连续接受选择性上内镜检查的40例患者。用五种不同的镊子以六种不同的方式使用,每次通过的咬合次数不同。两名病理学家对所使用的活检钳的类型视而不见,他们根据最大重量(mg),最大碎片的大小(mm),深度,壁球伪像,充分性和总体等级的参数对标本进行了评估。结果:共获得240份活检标本。 Microvasive Multibite和Megabite钳分别获得最大重量(P <0.05)和最大尺寸(P <0.05)的标本。鳄鱼钳能够获得明显大于椭圆形钳的标本(P <0.05)。奥林巴斯FB-24K钳在充分性评分和总体评分中均表现最佳(P <0.05)。结论:带针的钳子或多咬钳可以使每次通过的活检次数更多,并且可以提高所获得的组织的质量。 “无针”镊子可用于每次通过内窥镜获得两个样本,这与仅收集一个样本时一样好。这种方法可以节省时间,并且不会对活检标本造成重大损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号