首页> 外文期刊>Electrophoresis: The Official Journal of the International Electrophoresis Society >Thermooptical detection in microchips: from macro- to micro-scale with enhanced analytical parameters.
【24h】

Thermooptical detection in microchips: from macro- to micro-scale with enhanced analytical parameters.

机译:微芯片中的热光检测:从宏观到微观,分析参数得到增强。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we compared the methods of photothermal spectroscopy used in different spatial scales, namely thermal-lens spectrometry (TLS) and thermal-lens microscopy (TLM) to enhance the performance parameters in analytical procedures. All of the experimental results were confirmed by theoretical calculation. It was proven that the design for both TLM and TLS, despite a different scale for the effect, is governed by the same signal-generating and probing conditions (probe beam diameter at the sample should be equal to the diameter of the blooming thermal lens), and almost does not depend on the nature of the solvent. Theoretical and experimental instrumental error curves for thermal lensing were coincident. TLM obeys the same law of instrumental error as TLS and shows better repeatability for the same levels of thermal-lens signals or absorbances. TLS is more advantageous for studying low concentrations in bulk, while TLM shows much lower absolute LODs due to better repeatability for low amounts. The behavior of the thermal-lens signal with different flow rates was studied and optimum conditions, with the minimum contribution to total error, were found. These conditions are reproducible, are in agreement with the existing theory of the thermal response in thermal lensing, and do not significantly affect the design of the optimum scheme for setups. TLM showed low LODs in solvent extraction (down to 10(-8) M) and electrokinetic separation (10(-7) M), which were shown to be governed by discussed instrumental regularities, instead of by microchemistry.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了在不同空间范围内使用的光热光谱方法,即热透镜光谱(TLS)和热透镜显微镜(TLM),以提高分析程序中的性能参数。所有实验结果均通过理论计算得到证实。事实证明,尽管效果不同,TLM和TLS的设计还是由相同的信号生成和探测条件决定的(样品处的探测光束直径应等于热成像透镜的直径) ,并且几乎不取决于溶剂的性质。热透镜的理论和实验仪器误差曲线是重合的。 TLM遵循与TLS相同的仪器误差定律,并且在相同水平的热透镜信号或吸光度下显示出更好的可重复性。 TLS对于研究低浓度散装物更有利,而TLM显示出更低的绝对LOD,这是因为低含量的重复性更好。研究了不同流量下的热透镜信号的行为,发现了对总误差影响最小的最佳条件。这些条件是可重现的,与现有的热透镜热响应理论相一致,并且不会显着影响设置最佳方案的设计。 TLM在溶剂萃取(低至10(-8)M)和电动分离(10(-7)M)中显示出较低的LOD,这表明它们是由所讨论的仪器规律性而非微观化学决定的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号