...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >Episodic post-rift deformation in the south-eastern Australian passive margin: evidence from the Lapstone Structural Complex
【24h】

Episodic post-rift deformation in the south-eastern Australian passive margin: evidence from the Lapstone Structural Complex

机译:澳大利亚东南部被动边缘的裂谷后裂隙形变:来自Lapstone结构复合体的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Identifying the influence of neotectonics on the morphology of elevated passive margins is complicated in that major morpho-structural patterns might plausibly be explained by processes related to late Mesozoic to early Cenozoic rifting and/or differential erosion induced by Cenozoic epeirogenic uplift. The proportional contribution of each process can vary from continent to continent, and potentially even within the same passive margin. In the passive margin setting of the southeast Australian highlands the documented occurrence of neotectonic deformation is rare, and accordingly its role in landscape evolution is difficult to establish. The results of investigations within the Lapstone Structural Complex, which forms the eastern range front of the Blue Mountains Plateau, provide evidence for two periods of Cenozoic neotectonic uplift in this part of the highlands. The first, demonstrated by seismic and structural evidence, is suggested to have occurred in the Paleogene, and is thus unrelated to Cretaceous rifting. The second period, demonstrated by evidence from the Kurrajong Fault (presented herein) suggests that uplift occurred in both the Mio-Pliocene and the Middle Pleistocene. The cumulative Neogene and younger uplift of ~15m determined for the Kurrajong Fault is less than 10% of the 130m of total measured throw across the fault. The apparently minor contribution of neotectonism to the current elevation of the Blue Mountains Plateau supports a predominantly erosional exhumation origin for the topographic relief at the plateau's eastern edge. This finding contrasts with evidence from fault complexes associated with similar topographic relief elsewhere in the south-eastern highlands, indicating that present-day topography cannot be directly related to relief generated by Neogene and younger uplift, even from relatively closely-spaced (< 150 km) structures within the same passive margin. These findings have implications for understanding the spatio-temporal variability of post-rift faulting in continental passive margin settings and the evolution of landscapes therein.
机译:确定新构造对被动边缘升高形态的影响是复杂的,因为主要的形态构造模式可能可以用与中新生代晚期到新生代裂谷和/或新生代造山隆起引起的差异侵蚀有关的过程来解释。每个过程的比例贡献可能因大陆而异,甚至可能在相同的被动范围内。在澳大利亚东南高地的被动边缘环境中,新构造变形的发生很少见,因此很难确定其在景观演化中的作用。形成蓝山高原东部山脉前沿的立石结构综合体的调查结果为该高地的这两个时期的新生代新构造隆升提供了证据。第一个由地震和结构证据证明,建议发生在古近纪,因此与白垩纪裂谷无关。由库拉宗断裂(此处呈现)的证据表明,第二个时期表明隆起发生在上新世和中更新世。为库拉宗断裂确定的约15m的新近纪和年轻隆升的累积量小于整个断裂带130m实测投掷总量的10%。新构造运动对蓝山高原当前海拔的明显贡献很小,这为高原东部边缘的地形起伏提供了主要的侵蚀性掘尸发源。这一发现与东南高地其他地方类似地形起伏相关的断层复合体的证据形成对比,表明当今的地形即使与相对较近的距离(<150 km)也不能直接与新近纪和年轻隆升产生的起伏有关。 )结构在相同的被动幅度内。这些发现对于理解大陆被动边缘环境中裂谷后断层的时空变化及其景观演化具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号