首页> 外文期刊>Educational psychology review >The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
【24h】

The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?

机译:阅读的简单观点:它适用于不同类型的字母拼写法吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We present a meta-analysis to test the validity of the Simple View of Reading Gough & Tunmer (Remedial and Special Education, 7:6-10, 1986) for beginner readers of English and other, more transparent, orthographies. Our meta-analytic approach established that the relative influence of decoding and linguistic comprehension on reading comprehension is different for readers of different types of orthography during the course of early reading development. Furthermore, we identified key differences in the relations among different measures of decoding and reading comprehension between readers of English and other more transparent orthographies. We discuss the implications for reading instruction and the diagnosis of reading difficulties, as well as our theoretical understanding of how component skills influence reading comprehension level.
机译:我们提供了一项荟萃分析,以测试英语和其他更透明的拼字法初学者的“阅读古夫和滕默简单观点”(补救和特殊教育,1986年7:6-10)的有效性。我们的荟萃分析方法确定,在早期阅读发展过程中,不同类型的拼字法读者的解码和语言理解对阅读理解的相对影响是不同的。此外,我们发现英语读者与其他更透明的拼字法读者之间在解码和阅读理解的不同度量之间的关系上存在关键差异。我们讨论了阅读指导的含义和阅读困难的诊断,以及我们对组件技能如何影响阅读理解水平的理论理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号