首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Coping as Part of Motivational Resilience in School: A Multidimensional Measure of Families, Allocations, and Profiles of Academic Coping
【24h】

Coping as Part of Motivational Resilience in School: A Multidimensional Measure of Families, Allocations, and Profiles of Academic Coping

机译:应对作为学校动机韧性的一部分:家庭,分配和学业应对方式的多维量度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study was designed to examine a multidimensional measure of children's coping in the academic domain as part of a larger model of motivational resilience. Using items tapping multiple ways of dealing with academic problems, including five adaptive ways (strategizing, help-seeking, comfort-seeking, self-encouragement, and commitment) and six maladaptive ways (confusion, escape, concealment, self-pity, rumination, and projection), analyses of self-reports collected from 1,020 third through sixth graders in fall and spring of the same school year showed that item sets marking each way of coping were generally unidimensional and internally consistent; and confirmatory analyses showed that multidimensional models provided a good fit to the data for both adaptive and maladaptive coping at both time points. Of greatest interest were the connections of these ways of coping to the constructs from a model of motivational resilience. As predicted, adaptive coping was positively correlated with students' self-system processes of relatedness, competence, and autonomy as well as their ongoing engagement and reengagement, and negatively correlated with their catastrophizing appraisals and emotional reactivity. Maladaptive coping showed the opposite pattern of correlations. The potential utility of the measure, the different scores derived from it, and the role of constructive coping in motivational resilience are discussed.
机译:一项研究旨在检查儿童在应对学业方面的多维量度,作为更大的动机弹性模型的一部分。使用项目来挖掘解决学术问题的多种方式,包括五种适应性方式(策略化,寻求帮助,寻求安慰,自我鼓励和奉献)和六种适应不良的方式(混乱,逃避,隐瞒,自怜,反省,和预测),对同一学年秋季和春季从1,020个三年级至六年级学生收集的自我报告进行的分析表明,标记每种应对方式的项目集通常是一维的并且内部一致;验证性分析表明,多维模型为两个时间点的适应和适应不良应对提供了很好的数据。最令人感兴趣的是这些应对方式与动机弹性模型之间的联系。如预料的那样,适应性应对与学生的自我系统的相关性,能力和自主性以及与他们进行中的参与和重新参与的过程呈正相关,与他们的灾难性评估和情绪反应呈负相关。适应不良显示出相反的相关模式。讨论了该措施的潜在效用,从中得出的不同分数以及建设性应对在动机弹性中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号