...
首页> 外文期刊>Echocardiography. >Which protocol for which segment: a comparative study of different pharmacological stress echocardiography protocols for predicting viability in segments with varying degrees of dyssynergy.
【24h】

Which protocol for which segment: a comparative study of different pharmacological stress echocardiography protocols for predicting viability in segments with varying degrees of dyssynergy.

机译:哪个方案适用于哪个细分市场:比较不同药理学应力超声心动图方案的比较研究,以预测具有不同程度的协同不良作用的细分市场的生存能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological stress echocardiography is widely accepted for identifying potential contractile recovery after revascularization. We sought to compare the prognostic power of three pharmacological stress protocols for predicting contractile recovery of myocardial segments at varying degrees of dyssynergy. METHODS: We enrolled 100 consecutive patients with significant coronary stenosis amenable for revascularization and regional wall motion abnormality in the distribution of the affected artery. All patients underwent an assessment of regional wall motion according to the standard 16-segment model. The patients underwent three stress echocardiography protocols in separate sessions: low-dose dobutamine, infra-low-dose dipyridamole, and combined protocol. The patients underwent thereafter coronary revascularization either by percutaneous coronary angioplasty or by surgical bypass grafting. A follow-up echocardiography was performed 8 weeks after revascularization to assess regional wall motionabnormality. The predicted recovery by any of the three protocols for each category of segments was compared with actual contractility improvement. RESULTS: The combined protocol had a significantly higher sensitivity for predicting contractility recovery in all segment categories compared with the other two protocols. In addition, it had a similar specificity in hypokinetic and dyskinetic segments, though with a lower specificity in akinetic segments when compared with the low-dose dobutamine protocol, and a similar specificity in dyskinetic segments, though with a lower specificity in hypokinetic and akinetic segments when compared with the infra-low-dose dipyridamole protocol. CONCLUSION: In patients with predominantly akinetic/dyskinetic segments, the combined pharmacological stress protocol would better predict functional recovery after revascularization, as compared with the low-dose dobutamine and the infra-low-dose dipyridamole protocols.
机译:目的:药理学应力超声心动图已被广泛用于确定血运重建后的潜在收缩恢复。我们试图比较三种药理学应激方案在不同程度的协同不良作用下预测心肌节段收缩恢复的预后能力。方法:我们招募了100例连续的严重冠状动脉狭窄患者,这些患者适于在受累动脉的分布中进行血运重建和局部壁运动异常。所有患者均根据标准的16段模型进行了局部壁运动的评估。患者在单独的疗程中分别接受了三种压力超声心动图检查方案:低剂量多巴酚丁胺,下低剂量双嘧达莫和联合治疗方案。患者随后通过经皮冠状动脉血管成形术或外科旁路移植术进行冠状动脉血运重建。血运重建后8周进行了超声心动图检查,以评估局部室壁运动异常。将这三种方案中每种方案的预测恢复率与实际收缩率进行了比较。结果:与其他两种方案相比,组合方案对所有节段的收缩力恢复具有更高的敏感性。此外,与低剂量多巴酚丁胺方案相比,它在运动障碍和运动障碍方面具有相似的特异性,尽管在运动障碍方面具有较低的特异性,而在运动障碍方面的特异性相似,但在运动代谢和运动障碍方面具有较低的特异性。与低剂量双嘧达莫方案相比。结论:与低剂量多巴酚丁胺和低剂量双嘧达莫方案相比,在以运动/运动障碍为主的患者中,结合药理学应激方案可以更好地预测血运重建后的功能恢复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号