首页> 外文期刊>Echocardiography. >Comparison of intraoperative three-dimensional Doppler color flow mapping to assess mitral regurgitation
【24h】

Comparison of intraoperative three-dimensional Doppler color flow mapping to assess mitral regurgitation

机译:术中三维多普勒彩色血流图评估二尖瓣关闭不全的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) enables the determination of the vena contracta area (VCA), which is an approved parameter to quantify mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to determine the VCA in the operative setting and to compare it to alternative 3D and standard 2D methods, with respect to different etiologies of MR. Methods: MR in 56 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery was evaluated using 2D and 3D TEE. VCA, vena contracta (VC), and effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA) by 3D and 2D flow convergence methods were determined. The correlations among the methods and the determined areas were evaluated. Results: EROA determination using 3D flow convergence areas correlated strongly with VCA (r = 0.653), however the resulting areas were considerably smaller. VC measurements in the 3D data set correlated slightly less (r = 0.629). EROA, which was determined using 2D flow convergence areas, showed the strongest correlation among the 2D methods (r = 0.406). 2D VC measurements showed weak to no correlation with VCA. Although a correlation was detected when using the biplane method or the midesophageal long-axis view to measure VC, statistical significance was only reached in functional MR and MR due to simple prolapse. Conclusions: Intraoperative 3D methods to determine MR were feasible and showed improved correlation with VCA compared to 2D measurements. The agreement of 2D methods with VCA declined from functional MR to MR due to prolapse. We recommend the utilization of 3D color Doppler for intraoperative evaluation of MR, especially in patients with complex mitral valve prolapses.
机译:背景:三维(3D)经食道超声心动图(TEE)能够确定腔静脉收缩面积(VCA),这是用于量化二尖瓣反流(MR)的公认参数。这项研究的目的是确定手术环境中的VCA,并将其与MR的不同病因相关的3D和标准2D方法进行比较。方法:使用2D和3D TEE对连续进行心脏手术的56位患者的MR进行评估。通过3D和2D流量收敛方法确定了VCA,腔静脉收缩(VC)和有效的反流口面积(EROA)。评估了方法与确定区域之间的相关性。结果:使用3D流收敛区域确定EROA与VCA密切相关(r = 0.653),但是得到的区域要小得多。 3D数据集中的VC测量相关性较小(r = 0.629)。使用2D流量收敛区域确定的EROA显示2D方法之间的最强相关性(r = 0.406)。 2D VC测量显示与VCA弱相关或无相关性。尽管在使用双翼飞机方法或食管中轴长轴视图测量VC时检测到相关性,但由于脱垂简单,仅在功能性MR和MR中达到统计学意义。结论:术中3D方法确定MR是可行的,并且与2D测量相比显示出与VCA的相关性得到改善。由于脱垂,二维方法与VCA的一致性从功能性MR降低为MR。我们建议将3D彩色多普勒仪用于MR的术中评估,特别是对于二尖瓣脱垂复杂的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号