...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology >An eco-engineering assessment index for chemical pesticide pollution management strategies to complex agro-ecosystems
【24h】

An eco-engineering assessment index for chemical pesticide pollution management strategies to complex agro-ecosystems

机译:复杂农业生态系统化学农药污染管理策略的生态工程评估指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Human inputs into complex agro-ecosystems, such as those involving rice production, have ecological, economic, and social effects that can be positive or negative. We here described positive effects using the term comprehensive profit (CP), which included ecological, economic and social profits. The negative effects are termed comprehensive cost (CC), including ecological, economic and social losses. To develop an eco-engineering assessment system based on these parameters, we used a matrix of the ratios of comprehensive cost to comprehensive profit (R_(cc/cp)). where the i?cc/cp index matrix W_(CC/CP) is defined as the index optimization matrix of CC divided by the index optimization matrix of CP. We applied the basic principles and methods of Analytic Hierarchy Processes (AHP) to determine the comparative weight of indices derived in this manner as the basis for identifying one or more pesticide pollution management strategies for use in rice production systems in Shanghai, China. We used a generalized function to nondimension-alize the value of the index, and then to calculate the systematic evaluation index. The evaluating result range for CP used for this purpose was classified into 5 levels: excellent, better, general, bad and worst, as was the range for CC (very high, much high, common, much low and very low). Applying our assessment system (R_(CC/CP)) for five different pest control strategies in rice fields gave the order of value of the strategies to be: "applying environment-friendly pesticides 6 times and frequency vibration lamps with rice-milk vetch rotation mode" (0.744) < "applying environment-friendly pesticides 5 times and frequency vibration lamps with rice-milk vetch rotation mode" (0.747) < "applying environment-friendly pesticides 5 times and postponing transplanting date with rice-milk vetch rotation mode" (0.753) < "applying environment-friendly pesticides 6 times and postponing transplanting date with rice-milk vetch rotation mode" (0.760) < "applying common pesticides 9 times and following conventional transplanting date with rice-wheat rotation" (0.930). The treatment "applying environment-friendly pesticides 6 times and frequency vibration lamps with rice-milk vetch rotation mode" was determined to be the optimal chemical pollution management strategy for use in rice fields in Shanghai, China.
机译:人类对复杂农业生态系统的投入,例如涉及水稻生产的生态系统,会对生态,经济和社会产生积极或消极的影响。在这里,我们使用术语综合利润(CP)来描述其积极影响,其中包括生态,经济和社会利润。负面影响称为综合成本(CC),包括生态,经济和社会损失。为了基于这些参数开发生态工程评估系统,我们使用了综合成本与综合利润之比的矩阵(R_(cc / cp))。其中,i·cc / cp索引矩阵W_(CC / CP)定义为CC的索引优化矩阵除以CP的索引优化矩阵。我们应用了层次分析法(AHP)的基本原理和方法来确定以此方式得出的指标的相对权重,以此为基础来确定一种或多种用于中国水稻生产系统的农药污染管理策略。我们使用广义函数对指标的值进行无量纲化,然后计算系统评价指标。为此使用的CP的评估结果范围分为5个级别:优异,更好,一般,不良和最差,以及CC的范围(非常高,非常高,普通,非常低和非常低)。将我们的评估系统(R_(CC / CP))用于稻田中的五种不同害虫控制策略,得出该策略的价值顺序为:“应用环保型6倍农药农药和频数振动灯,并施以紫花etch蒲模式“(0.744)<”将环境友好的农药5次和频率振动灯以米奇紫花苜蓿旋转模式应用“(0.747)<”将环境友好的农药5次并以水稻-小菜红色素旋转模式推迟移植日期“ (0.753)<“将环保型农药施用6次,并以紫云英轮换模式推迟移栽日期”(0.760)<“将普通农药施用9次并在常规的移栽日期后,以稻麦轮换”(0.930)。确定“应用环保型六倍频农药灯和水稻乳汁with虫轮作模式”的处理方法是中国上海稻田使用的最佳化学污染管理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号