首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Applications >Using vertebrate prey capture locations to identify cover type selection patterns of nocturnally foraging Burrowing Owls
【24h】

Using vertebrate prey capture locations to identify cover type selection patterns of nocturnally foraging Burrowing Owls

机译:使用脊椎动物的猎物捕获位置来识别夜间觅食挖洞猫头鹰的掩盖类型选择模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies of habitat selection often measure an animal’s use of space via radiotelemetry or GPS-based technologies. Such data tend to be analyzed using a resource selection function, despite the fact that the actual resources acquired are typically not recorded. Without explicit proof of resource use, conclusions from RSF models are based on assumptions regarding an animal’s behavior and the resources gained. Conservation initiatives are often based on space-use models, and could be detrimental to the target species if these assumptions are incorrect. We used GPS dataloggers and digital video recorders to determine precise locations where nocturnally foraging Burrowing Owls acquired food resources (vertebrate prey). We compared land cover type selection patterns using a presence-only resource selection function (RSF) to a model that incorporated prey capture locations (CRSF). We also compared net prey returns in each cover type to better measure reward relative to foraging effort. The RSF method did not reflect prey capture patterns and covertype rankings from this model were quite different from models that used only locations where prey was known to have been obtained. Burrowing Owls successfully foraged across all cover types; however, return vs. effort models indicate that different cover types were of higher quality than those identified using resource selection functions. Conclusions about the type of resources acquired should not be made from RSF-style models without evidence that the actual resource of interest was acquired. Conservation efforts based on RSF models alone may be ineffective or detrimental to the target species if the limiting resource and where it is acquired are not properly identified.
机译:有关栖息地选择的研究通常通过无线电遥测法或基于GPS的技术来衡量动物对空间的利用。尽管通常不会记录所获取的实际资源,但倾向于使用资源选择功能来分析此类数据。在没有明确证明资源使用的情况下,RSF模型的结论是基于关于动物行为和获得资源的假设。保护措施通常基于空间使用模型,如果这些假设不正确,可能会对目标物种造成不利影响。我们使用GPS数据记录仪和数字视频记录仪来确定夜间觅食挖猫头鹰获得的食物资源(脊椎动物的猎物)的精确位置。我们将使用仅存在资源选择功能(RSF)的土地覆盖物类型选择模式与包含猎物捕获位置(CRSF)的模型进行了比较。我们还比较了每种掩护类型的猎物净回报,以更好地衡量相对于觅食努力的回报。 RSF方法无法反映猎物的捕获模式,该模型的封面类型排名与仅使用已知已获取猎物的位置的模型有很大不同。挖洞的猫头鹰成功地觅食了所有类型的掩体;但是,回报与工作量模型表明,与使用资源选择功能确定的封面类型相比,不同的封面类型质量更高。如果没有证据表明已获得实际感兴趣的资源,则不应从RSF样式的模型得出有关获得的资源类型的结论。如果不能正确地识别出限制资源及其来源,仅基于RSF模型的保护工作可能对目标物种无效或有害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号