【24h】

Cross-Cutting Categorization Schemes in the Digital Humanities

机译:数字人文学科的交叉切割分类方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Digital access to large amounts of scholarly text presents both challenges and opportunities for researchers in the humanities. Meeting these challenges depends on having high-quality representations of the contents of digital resources suitable for both machines and humans to use. Different ways of categorizing these contents are appropriate for different purposes, leading to the further problem of relating the contents of different categorization schemes to each other. This essay discusses the rationale for categorizing philosophical concepts and surveys some of the main approaches to doing so for materials that are continuously changing. It describes the goals and methods of the Indiana Philosophy Ontology (InPhO) project and provides an example of the kind of analysis that is made possible by powerful modeling methods.
机译:数字化获取大量学术文本给人文科学的研究人员既带来挑战,也带来机遇。应对这些挑战取决于拥有适合机器和人类使用的数字资源内容的高质量表示形式。将这些内容分类的不同方法适合于不同的目的,从而导致另一个问题,即将不同分类方案的内容相互关联。本文讨论了对哲学概念进行分类的基本原理,并探讨了针对不断变化的材料进行分类的一些主要方法。它描述了印第安那哲学本体论(InPhO)项目的目标和方法,并提供了通过强大的建模方法实现的那种分析的示例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号