【24h】

Global Histories, Vernacular Science, and African Genealogies

机译:全球历史,白话科学和非洲家谱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scholars in imperial and science studies have recently begun to examine more systemat-ically the different ways knowledge systems around the world have intersected. This essayconcentrates on one aspect of this process, the codification of research into "primitive" or"indigenous" knowledge, especially knowledge that was transmitted orally, and arguesthat such investigations were a by-product of four interrelated phenomena: the globaliza-tion of the sciences themselves, particularly those fields that took the earth and itsinhabitants as their object of analysis; the professionalization of anthropology and itsgrowing emphasis on studying other cultures' medical, technical, and natural knowledge;the European push, in the late nineteenth century, toward "global colonialism" and theethnographic research that accompanied colonial state building; and, finally, colonizedand marginalized peoples' challenges to scientific epistemologies and their paradoxicalcall that scientists study their knowledge systems more carefully. These phenomena cametogether on a global scale in the decades surrounding the turn of the twentieth century toproduce a subgenre of research within the sciences, here labeled "vernacular science,"focused explicitly on "native" knowledge.
机译:帝国和科学研究领域的学者们最近开始更系统地研究世界各地知识体系相交的不同方式。本文着重于这一过程的一个方面,即对“原始”或“本土”知识,特别是口头传播的知识进行研究的编纂,并认为这种研究是四个相互关联的现象的副产品:科学本身,特别是那些以地球及其居民为分析对象的领域;人类学的专业化及其对研究其他文化的医学,技术和自然知识的重视日益增强;欧洲在19世纪后期推动了“全球殖民主义”和伴随殖民地国家建设的民族志研究;最后,殖民化和边缘化的人们对科学认识论的挑战以及他们要求科学家更加仔细地研究他们的知识体系的悖论。在二十世纪初的几十年中,这些现象在全球范围内汇聚在一起,从而产生了一种科学内的研究子流派,这里称之为“本土科学”,专门针对“本土”知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号