首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >Ethnography, Agency, and Materiality: Anthropological Perspectives on Rice Development in East Timor
【24h】

Ethnography, Agency, and Materiality: Anthropological Perspectives on Rice Development in East Timor

机译:人种学,代理与实质:东帝汶水稻发展的人类学视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Rice in contemporary East Timor is multivalent, with a rich historical legacy. In the current postcolonial context, rice agriculture and the value of rice as both a consumption good and a development objective remain a priority. Government-sponsored rice production is framed variously as "food security" for the poor and as a key objective of "agricultural modernization" for a new class of dynamic farmers in a progressive market-oriented food production sector. In this article we present a com-parative study of two rice development projects in East Timor that promote enhanced yields and production of irrigated rice through improved seed germplasm and other technologies of development. The Tapo-Memo scheme and the initiative known as "Seeds of Life" illustrate contrasting engagements with technoscientific development. We adopt three intersecting anthropological perspectives: sociocultural anthropol-ogy, the anthropology of development, and applied development anthropology. From the former we know rice as a set of cultural practices. The anthropology of develop-ment critiques and analyzes rice development in the light of existing farmer practices and technosocial relations. And applied anthropology seeks to act instrumentally to improve rice development interventions. The novelty of the article is to mix these perspectives while recognizing the methodological, interpretative, and subdisciplin-ary differences that separate them. We incorporate the analytical tool of the "boundary object" to examine how rice agency is experientially constituted and politically nego-tiated along the contours and at the boundaries of international development oper-ations, national policy, extension agents, and the everyday lives, livelihoods, and aspirations of farmers.
机译:当代东帝汶的稻米是多价的,具有丰富的历史遗产。在当前的后殖民时期,稻米农业以及稻米作为消费品和发展目标的价值仍然是优先事项。政府资助的大米生产被不同程度地定义为穷人的“粮食安全”,也被定义为逐步发展的以市场为导向的粮食生产部门中新的有活力的农民的“农业现代化”的主要目标。在本文中,我们对东帝汶的两个水稻开发项目进行了比较研究,这些项目通过改良种子种质和其他开发技术来提高水稻的产量和产量。 Tapo-Memo计划和被称为“生命的种子”的计划说明了参与与技术科学发展的对比。我们采用三种相交的人类学视角:社会文化人类学,发展人类学和应用发展人类学。从前者我们知道稻米是一种文化习俗。发展批判的人类学,并根据现有的农民实践和技术社会关系分析了水稻的发展。应用人类学力图采取行动改善水稻发展干预措施。本文的新颖之处在于将这些观点混合在一起,同时认识到将它们分开的方法论,解释性和亚学科差异。我们结合“边界对象”的分析工具来研究水稻代理机构是如何沿着国际发展业务,国家政策,推广人员以及日常生活,生计的轮廓和边界经验性地组成和进行政治谈判的,以及农民的愿望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号