首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >Suzanne Moon, Technology and Ethical Idealism. A History of Development in the Netherlands East Indies
【24h】

Suzanne Moon, Technology and Ethical Idealism. A History of Development in the Netherlands East Indies

机译:Suzanne Moon,技术与道德唯心主义。荷兰东印度的发展史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Suzanne Moon’s Technology and Ethical Idealism provides a meticulous and elegant history of the place of technology in debates about development in the late-colonial Netherlands East Indies. While most scholars and policymakers concerned with development issues will be familiar with the “small is beautiful” (Schumaker 1973) approach to development that emerged in the 1970s, few will be aware that many of the core arguments put forward in favor of “appropriate technologies” were in fact rehearsed in great detail in colonial debates about how best to increase production and improve human welfare in what is now Indonesia. Moon’s book focuses on the period between 1900 and 1942, a span of time that saw the Dutch administration become deeply involved in the everyday life of its colonial subjects. This period is usually associated with high modernism and the view that the introduction of new technologies will lead to a better society (Barker 2002; Mrázek 2002). What Moon shows is that the faith in technology to deliver a better society was here not generally associated with a commitment to large-scale projects. On the contrary, in both agriculture and industry, the administration overwhelmingly used strategies that emphasized the benefits of small-scale technologies that were tailored to suit local needs and local knowledge. Moon thus provides a powerful challenge to the idea put forth by James Scott (1998) that high modernist state development projects obey a simplifying logic and tend to ignore the specificity of local circumstances. In the Netherlands East Indies, there was no shortage of disagreement over how best to pursue development, but there was a widespread acceptance of the view that new technologies would only encourage development if they were calibrated to fit local circumstances.
机译:苏珊·穆恩(Suzanne Moon)的技术与道德唯心主义在殖民后期的荷属东印度群岛的发展辩论中,为技术的地位提供了细致而优雅的历史。尽管大多数关注发展问题的学者和决策者都熟悉1970年代出现的“小是美”(Schumaker 1973)的发展方法,但很少有人会意识到,许多支持“适当技术”的核心论点实际上,是在殖民辩论中详细演练的,辩论的主题是如何在如今的印尼最大程度地提高产量和改善人类福利。穆恩(Moon)的书着重于1900年至1942年这段时期,这段时期见证了荷兰政府深入参与其殖民主体的日常生活。这个时期通常与高度现代主义以及新技术的引入将带来更好的社会有关(Barker 2002;Mrázek2002)。 Moon所表明的是,对提供更美好社会的技术信念在这里通常与对大型项目的承诺无关。相反,在农业和工业领域,政府都以压倒性优势采用了一些策略,这些策略强调了适合当地需求和当地知识的小型技术的优势。因此,穆恩对詹姆斯·斯科特(James Scott,1998)提出的想法提出了有力的挑战,即高级现代主义国家发展项目遵循简化的逻辑,并倾向于忽略当地情况的特殊性。在荷兰东印度群岛,对于如何最好地追求发展并不存在分歧,但是,人们普遍接受这样一种观点,即只有对新技术进行了调整以适应当地情况才能鼓励发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号