【24h】

Of Models and Machines: Implementing Bounded Rationality

机译:模型和机器:实现有限的理性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This essay explores the early history of Herbert Simon's principle of bounded rationality in the context of his Artificial Intelligence research in the mid 1950s. It focuses in particular on how Simon and his colleagues at the RAND Corporation translated a model of human reasoning into a computer program, the Logic Theory Machine. They were motivated by a belief that computers and minds were the same kind of thing-namely, information-processing systems. The Logic Theory Machine program was a model of how people solved problems in elementary mathematical logic. However, in making this model actually run on their 1950s computer, the JOHNNIAC, Simon and his colleagues had to navigate many obstacles and material constraints quite foreign to the human experience of logic. They crafted new tools and engaged in new practices that accommodated the affordances of their machine, rather than reflecting the character of human cognition and its bounds. The essay argues that tracking this implementation effort shows that "internal" cognitive practices and "external" tools and materials are not so easily separated as they are in Simon's principle of bounded rationality-the latter often shaping the dynamics of the former.
机译:本文以1950年代中期的人工智能研究为背景,探讨了赫伯特·西蒙(Herbert Simon)的有限理性原理的早期历史。它特别关注RAND公司的Simon和他的同事如何将人类推理模型转换为计算机程序Logic Theory Machine。他们的动机是相信计算机和思维是同一类事物,即信息处理系统。逻辑理论机器程序是人们如何解决基本数学逻辑问题的模型。但是,在使该模型实际在其1950年代的计算机上运行时,JOHNNIAC,Simon和他的同事们不得不克服许多障碍和物质约束,而这对人类的逻辑经验是非常陌生的。他们制作了新的工具,并采用了适应其机器性能的新方法,而不是反映人类认知的特征及其界限。文章认为,跟踪这种实施工作表明,“内部”认知实践和“外部”工具与材料不像西蒙有限理性原则中那样容易分离,后者通常会塑造前者的动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号