...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >Ultra-Fast Carotid CT-Angiography: Low Versus Standard Volume Contrast Material Protocol for a 128-Slice CT-System.
【24h】

Ultra-Fast Carotid CT-Angiography: Low Versus Standard Volume Contrast Material Protocol for a 128-Slice CT-System.

机译:超快速颈动脉CT血管造影:128层CT系统的低体积与标准体积对比材料协议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES:: Noninvasive imaging is increasingly accepted for the evaluation of atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of a low-contrast media volume protocol for carotid computed tomography angiography (CTA) using a 128-slice-spiral-computed tomography scanner with a gantry rotation time of 300 milliseconds. METHODS AND MATERIALS:: Thirty consecutive patients underwent CTA for the evaluation of the carotid vessels, with a 128-section scanner. Fifteen patients were examined with a standard volume contrast injection protocol (group A): 80 mL of contrast material (CM) were injected at 5 mL/s using the test bolus method to assess individual transit time. Another 15 patients were examined with a low-volume contrast media protocol (group B): 30 mL CM were injected at 4 mL/s using bolus tracking to trigger the CTA acquisition. In both groups, contrast administration was followed by a saline flush. Image quality and segmental vascular enhancement as well as the presence and degree of arterial stenosis were independently evaluated by 2 radiologists. Venous enhancement and streak artifacts at the thoracic inlet because of highly concentrated CM in the subclavian veins were evaluated in both groups. Kappa statistic and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to quantify interobserver variability. Qualitative data were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and student t test was used to investigate differences in segmental vessel attenuation. RESULTS:: All studies were of diagnostic quality in both groups. Interobserver agreement was high (kappa = 0.82, group A; kappa = 0.78, group B). Attenuation measurement showed excellent interobserver correlation in both groups (r > 0.9). Mean enhancement values were slightly higher in group A, but without statistical significance when averaged for all segments (P = 0.06). Streak artifacts impaired evaluation of 13 adjacent arterial segments in 8 patients at the level of the thoracic inlet in group A. In group B, only 1 segment was rated insufficient by both radiologists. Venous enhancement was significantly lower in group B (P = 0.04). The low-contrast protocol proved to be the more robust method with constant high arterial enhancement, less streak artifacts at the thoracic inlet, and less venous overlay. CONCLUSION:: Using the latest CT technology, optimal depiction of the craniocervical arteries can be archived with a low-volume (30 mL) CM protocol.
机译:目的:无创成像越来越多地被用于评估颈动脉粥样硬化疾病。我们试图评估使用128层螺旋计算机断层扫描仪,龙门旋转时间为300毫秒的颈动脉CT血管造影术(CTA)的低对比度介质体积协议的可行性。方法和材料:连续30例患者接受128线扫描仪行CTA评估颈动脉。用标准体积造影剂注射方案对15例患者进行了检查(A组):使用测试推注方法以5 mL / s的速度注射80 mL造影剂(CM)以评估个体的通过时间。另一例15例患者接受了低剂量造影剂方案检查(B组):以推注跟踪方式以触发CTA采集,以4 mL / s的速度注射了30 mL CM。在两组中,对比给药后均用盐水冲洗。影像质量和节段性血管增强以及动脉狭窄的存在和程度由两名放射科医生独立评估。两组均评估了由于锁骨下静脉中CM高度集中而导致的胸腔入口处的静脉增强和条痕伪影。使用Kappa统计量和Pearson相关系数来量化观察者间的变异性。使用Wilcoxon符号秩次检验比较定性数据,并使用student t检验研究节段性血管衰减的差异。结果:两组均具有诊断质量。观察者之间的一致性很高(A组卡帕= 0.82; B组卡帕= 0.78)。衰减测量显示两组之间的观察者间相关性极佳(r> 0.9)。 A组的平均增强值略高,但所有部分的平均值均无统计学意义(P = 0.06)。条纹伪影损害了A组胸腔入口水平的8位患者的13个相邻动脉节段的评估。在B组中,两位放射线医师均仅将1个节段评估为不足。 B组的静脉强化显着降低(P = 0.04)。低对比度协议被证明是一种更稳定的方法,具有持续不断的高动脉增强功能,胸腔入口处的条纹痕迹更少,静脉覆盖更少。结论::使用最新的CT技术,可以通过小体积(30 mL)CM协议保存对颅颈动脉的最佳描绘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号