首页> 外文期刊>International Urology and Nephrology >Predicting prostate biopsy outcome: artificial neural networks and polychotomous regression are equivalent models.
【24h】

Predicting prostate biopsy outcome: artificial neural networks and polychotomous regression are equivalent models.

机译:预测前列腺活检结果:人工神经网络和多分类回归是等效模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Complex statistical models utilizing multiple inputs to derive a risk assessment may benefit prostate cancer (PC) detection where focus has been on prostate-specific antigen (PSA). This study develops a polychotomous logistic regression (PR) model and an artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting biopsy results, particularly for clinically significant PC. METHODS: There were 3,025 men undergoing TRUS-guided biopsy (BX) with PSA <10 ng/ml selected. BX outcome classified as benign, atypical small acinar proliferation or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (ASAP/PIN), non-significant (NSPC) or clinically significant PC (CSPC). PR and ANN models were developed to distinguish between BX categories. Predictors were age, PSA, abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), positive transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and prostate volume. RESULTS: Among the BXs, 44% were benign, 14% ASAP/PIN, 16% NSPC and 25% CSPC. Median age, PSA and volume were 64 years, 5.7 ng/ml and 50 cc. TRUS lesion was present in 47%, and DRE was abnormal in 39%. PR and ANN models did not differ on percentage BX outcomes correctly predicted (55, 57%, respectively) and were equally poor for both ASAP/PIN (0%) and NSPC (2%). For PR and ANN, 74-78% ASAP/PIN predicted benign, 2% NSPC and 20-24% CSPC. For NSPC, 69-71% predicted benign, 27-29% CSPC. Benign outcomes were well identified (86-88%), although 12-13% classified CSPC. CSPC was correctly identified in 65-66% with misclassifications largely benign (33% for PR and ANN). CONCLUSIONS: Neither PR nor ANN was able to distinguish between the four biopsy outcomes: ASAP/PIN and NSPC were not distinguished from benign or CSPC. ANN did not perform better than PR. Inclusion of additional predictors may increase the performance of statistical models in predicting BX outcome.
机译:简介:利用多个输入进行风险评估的复杂统计模型可能有益于前列腺癌(PC)检测,而重点是前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)。这项研究开发了一个多选择逻辑回归(PR)模型和一个人工神经网络(ANN),用于预测活检结果,特别是对于临床意义重大的PC。方法:3025名男性接受TRUS引导活检(BX),选择PSA <10 ng / ml。 BX结局分为良性,非典型性小腺泡增生或高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(ASAP / PIN),无意义(NSPC)或临床意义上的PC(CSPC)。开发PR和ANN模型以区分BX类别。预测因素是年龄,PSA,直肠指检异常(DRE),经直肠超声检查(TRUS)和前列腺体积。结果:在BX中,良性为44%,ASAP / PIN为14%,NSPC为16%,CSPC为25%。中位年龄,PSA和体积分别为64岁,5.7 ng / ml和50 cc。 TRUS病变占47%,DRE异常占39%。 PR和ANN模型在正确预测的BX结局百分比方面没有差异(分别为55%,57%),并且对于ASAP / PIN(0%)和NSPC(2%)同样差。对于PR和ANN,74-8%的ASAP / PIN预测为良性,2%的NSPC和20-24%的CSPC。对于NSPC,69-71%预测为良性,27-29%CSPC。良性结局得到很好的识别(86-88%),尽管12-13%将CSPC分类。正确识别CSPC的正确分类率为65-66%,错误分类大致上是良性的(PR和ANN为33%)。结论:PR和ANN均不能区分这四种活检结果:ASAP / PIN和NSPC与良性或CSPC无关。 ANN的表现并不比PR好。包含其他预测变量可能会提高统计模型预测BX结局的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号