...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >T1-weighted imaging of the brain at 3 tesla using a 2-dimensional spoiled gradient echo technique.
【24h】

T1-weighted imaging of the brain at 3 tesla using a 2-dimensional spoiled gradient echo technique.

机译:使用二维损坏的梯度回波技术在3特斯拉处T1加权的大脑成像。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate a 2-dimensional spoiled gradient echo (GRE) imaging approach using a very short in-phase TE for routine T1-weighted imaging of the brain at 3 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient examinations were compared from a 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) unit located immediately adjacent to a similarly equipped 1.5 T unit. Pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images were evaluated and compared at 1.5 versus 3 T with a 2-dimensional (2-D) spin echo sequence used at 1.5 T and a 2-D GRE sequence at 3 T. The 2 MR systems used are from the same vendor, use similar 8-channel coils, and use identical gradients. The T1-weighted GRE sequence, used at 3 T, relies on a short TE (2.4 ms) to limit flow-related and susceptibility artifacts. Region-of-interest analysis was performed on 16 different sagittal patient examinations at both field strengths (32 total) and similarly on 10 different pre- and postcontrast axial examinations (40 total). Four blinded neuroradiologists also evaluated these studies. RESULTS: Using an off-midline sagittal slice depicting the caudate nucleus (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] 163 +/- 28 vs. 70 +/- 7, 3 T vs. 1.5 T) and corona radiata (SNR 214 +/- 35 vs. 82 +/- 10), 3 T markedly outperformed 1.5 T in both SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (51 +/- 14 vs. 12 +/- 5). On axial imaging, despite a reduction in slice thickness (5 to 3 mm) and scan time (5 to 1 minute), there was no significant difference pre- or postcontrast in SNR and CNR comparing 3 and 1.5 T. On blinded film review, 3 T performed slightly better on sagittal scans than 1.5 T in regard to motion artifacts (reduced), gray-white matter differentiation, and overall image quality. On axial scans, 3 T performed markedly better in all 3 categories both pre- and postcontrast. In regard to overall image quality, 3 T was preferred 9:2 precontrast and 4:1 postcontrast. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality, thin-section (3-mm) T1-weighted imaging can be readily performed at 3 T using a short TE 2-D GRE technique. This approach offers superior SNR and CNR with reduced motion artifacts and scan time as compared with imaging at 1.5 T and is advocated for routine brain imaging at 3 T. It is robust (used in over 1500 patients to date) and does not experience significant specific absorption ratio limitations, poor tissue contrast, or accentuated motion artifacts like encountered with spin echo T1-weighted imaging at 3 T.
机译:理由和目的:这项研究的目的是评估使用非常短的同相TE进行3 T时脑部T1加权常规成像的二维变差梯度回波(GRE)成像方法。材料和方法:患者比较了3T磁共振(MR)单元与紧邻的类似装备的1.5 T单元的检查结果。评估对比前后的T1加权图像,并在1.5与3 T时进行比较,并在1.5 T处使用二维(2-D)自旋回波序列,在3 T时使用2-D GRE序列。使用的2 MR系统来自同一供应商,使用相似的8通道线圈,并使用相同的梯度。 T1加权GRE序列在3 T时使用,它依赖于较短的TE(2.4 ms)来限制与流量相关的和易感的伪影。感兴趣区域分析是在两种场强下(共32个)对16个不同的矢状位检查进行的,并且类似地对10个不同的前后对比轴向检查(共40个)进行了分析。四位盲人神经放射科医生也评估了这些研究。结果:使用中线下矢状切面切片描绘尾状核(信噪比[SNR] 163 +/- 28 vs. 70 +/- 7、3 T vs. 1.5 T)和日冕辐射(SNR 214 + /-35 vs. 82 +/- 10),在SNR和对比噪声比(CNR)方面,3 T明显优于1.5 T(51 +/- 14 vs. 12 +/- 5)。在轴向成像中,尽管切片厚度(5到3 mm)和扫描时间(5到1分钟)减小了,但SNR和CNR的对比前和对比后3和1.5 T均无显着差异。在运动伪影(减少),灰白色物质区分和整体图像质量方面,矢状位扫描3 T的表现比1.5 T略好。在轴向扫描中,3 T在对比前和对比后的所有3个类别中的表现均明显更好。就整体图像质量而言,3 T最好在9:2的对比前和4:1的对比。结论:使用短的TE 2-D GRE技术可以轻松地在3 T下进行高质量,薄型(3 mm)T1加权成像。与1.5 T显像相比,此方法可提供出众的SNR和CNR,并减少了运动伪像和扫描时间,并被推荐用于3 T常规脑成像。它具有鲁棒性(迄今为止已用于1500多名患者),并且没有明显的特异性吸收率限制,较差的组织对比度或加重的运动伪像,如3 T下自旋回波T1加权成像所遇到的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号