首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Surface Science and Engineering >Comparative study of three methods for measuring thickness of PVD hard coatings
【24h】

Comparative study of three methods for measuring thickness of PVD hard coatings

机译:三种测量PVD硬涂层厚度的方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study presents a comparison between three methods that are widely employed for measuring thickness of PVD hard coatings, namely: the calotte grinding method (CGM), glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GDOES) and metallographic micro polishing (MMP). Thickness measurements were performed in several coating structures deposited on steel substrates. Based on the results, a discussion of their main advantages and disadvantages is presented, focusing on the complementarities between the three methods. Each method provided results at various levels of cost, accuracy and time. The high precision of MMP is the main advantage of this method; however sample preparation is time consuming. GDOES provides quick results but the equipment and testing costs are high. The CGM is the quickest and less expensive, but not the most accurate. It was concluded from this study that no method is better than the others; instead, each method should be regarded as complementary to one another.
机译:这项研究提出了三种广泛用于测量PVD硬质涂层厚度的方法的比较,分别是:细磨法(CGM),辉光放电发射光谱(GDOES)和金相显微抛光(MMP)。在沉积在钢基材上的几种涂层结构中进行厚度测量。基于结果,讨论了它们的主要优点和缺点,重点是三种方法之间的互补性。每种方法所提供的结果的成本,准确性和时间各不相同。 MMP的高精度是该方法的主要优势。但是,样品制备非常耗时。 GDOES提供了快速的结果,但是设备和测试成本很高。 CGM是最快,最便宜的,但不是最准确的。从这项研究得出的结论是,没有一种方法比其他方法更好。相反,每种方法应被视为彼此互补。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号