IUGA-ICS terminology and standardization documents: maximal use offers maximum patient and academic benefit.

摘要

An article by Freeman et al. [1] in this issue illustrates both the importance and the benefits of using the International Urogy-necological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) terminology and standardization documents produced over recent years [2-5]. The first three [2-4] documents are used and referenced, with reference 5 published subsequently and not specifically relevant to the study. Clarity of terminology is ensured by use of the IUGA-ICS terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction [2]. This is acknowledged at the end of the "Methods" section by the statement "methods, definitions and units conform to the standards jointly recommended by IUGA and ICS, except where specifically noted." There is, as a result, a minimal chance of misinterpretation of terminology by either referee or reader.