首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Absence of relationship between oblique muscle size and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon in clinically diagnosed superior oblique palsy.
【24h】

Absence of relationship between oblique muscle size and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon in clinically diagnosed superior oblique palsy.

机译:在临床诊断的上斜肌麻痹中,斜肌大小与bielschowsky头倾斜现象之间没有相关性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To study whether the variation in maximum oblique muscle size accounts for individual variation in the Bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon (BHTP) in clinically diagnosed superior oblique (SO) palsy. METHODS: Seventeen subjects with clinically diagnosed early-onset or idiopathic SO palsy and 14 normal subjects were enrolled in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in coronal and sagittal planes was used for quantitative morphometry of inferior oblique (IO) and SO muscles. Maximum cross-sectional area of the SO and IO cross section at the mid-inferior rectus crossing were determined in central gaze and compared with paretic eye hypertropia on ipsilesional versus contralesional head tilt. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) maximum SO cross section was 18.1 +/- 3.2 mm(2) in normal subjects, 14.2 +/- 6.8 mm(2) ipsilesional to SO palsy, and 19.2 +/- 4.5 mm(2) contralesional to SO palsy. The ipsilesional SO cross section was significantly smaller than the contralesional (P = 0.004) and normal (P = 0.01) ones.The mean IO cross section was 18.3 +/- 3.5 mm(2) in normal subjects, 21.3 +/- 7.9 mm(2) ipsilesional to SO palsy (P = 0.43), and 22.0 +/- 6.7 mm(2) contralesional to SO palsy (P = 0.26). Hyperdeviation varied with head tilt by 20.1 +/- 5.5 degrees in subjects with SO atrophy, and 10.3 +/- 5.6 degrees in subjects without SO atrophy (P = 0.003). Although oblique muscle cross sections did not correlate with BHTP, subjects with clinically diagnosed SO palsy segregated into groups exhibiting normal versus atrophic SO size. CONCLUSIONS: SO size does not account for the variation in BHTP in clinically diagnosed SO palsy, supporting the proposition that the BHTP is nonspecific for SO function.
机译:目的:研究最大斜肌大小的变化是否解释了在临床诊断的上斜肌麻痹中的Bielschowsky头倾斜现象(BHTP)的个体差异。方法:本研究招募了17名临床诊断为早期发作或特发性SO麻痹的受试者和14名正常受试者。冠状面和矢状面的磁共振成像(MRI)用于定量分析下斜肌(IO)和SO肌肉。在中央注视下确定中下直肌交叉处的SO和IO横截面的最大横截面积,并将其与同侧和对侧头部倾斜的视线增生比较。结果:正常受试者的平均(最大±SD)最大SO横截面为18.1 +/- 3.2毫米(2),同侧麻痹同侧为14.2 +/- 6.8毫米(2),以及19.2 +/- 4.5毫米(2) )与麻痹相反。同侧SO横截面显着小于对侧对侧(P = 0.004)和正常对侧(P = 0.01)。正常受试者的平均IO横截面为18.3 +/- 3.5 mm(2),21.3 +/- 7.9 mm (2)同侧麻痹(P = 0.43)和22.0 +/- 6.7 mm(2)对侧麻痹(P = 0.26)。患有SO萎缩的受试者的过度偏斜随头倾斜的变化为20.1 +/- 5.5度,而没有SO萎缩的受试者的偏斜为10.3 +/- 5.6度(P = 0.003)。尽管斜肌横断面与BHTP不相关,但临床诊断为SO麻痹的受试者被分成表现出相对于萎缩SO大小正常的组。结论:SO大小不能解释临床诊断的SO麻痹中BHTP的变化,支持BHTP对SO功能非特异性的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号