首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Comments on Chen et al.: Conservative versus surgical management of Pipkin type I fractures associated with posterior dislocation of the hip: a randomised controlled trial.
【24h】

Comments on Chen et al.: Conservative versus surgical management of Pipkin type I fractures associated with posterior dislocation of the hip: a randomised controlled trial.

机译:对Chen等人的评论:保守治疗与手术治疗与髋关节后脱位相关的I型Pipkin骨折:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We read the article by Chen et al. [2] with great interest. In this randomised controlled trial, the authors concluded that closed reduction followed by surgical fragment excision for Pipkin type 1 fractures is better than closed reduction alone. However, we have several concerns regarding the treatment methods and their outcome evaluation in this study.Before discussing the article by Chen et al., we briefly describe the current strategy for Pipkin fracture-dislocation management focusing mainly on type 1 fracture [1]. The philosophy of Epstein in the management of femoral-head fracture is no longer accepted. Epstein believed that closed reduction was contraindicated for fracture dislocation of the hip when open reduction is planned later.
机译:我们阅读了Chen等的文章。 [2]很有兴趣。在这项随机对照试验中,作者得出的结论是,对于1型Pipkin骨折,先行闭合复位再行外科手术切除术比单独闭合闭合更好。但是,在这项研究中,我们对治疗方法及其效果评估存在一些担忧。在讨论Chen等人的文章之前,我们简要介绍了目前主要针对1型骨折的Pipkin骨折脱位管理策略[1]。爱泼斯坦在股骨头骨折治疗中的哲学已不再被接受。爱泼斯坦(Epstein)认为,当稍后计划开放复位时,闭合复位是髋部骨折脱位的禁忌症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号