首页> 外文期刊>International ophthalmology >Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900~R optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound
【24h】

Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900~R optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound

机译:Lenstar LS 900〜R光学生物测定法与浸入式A扫描超声的屈光结果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To determine the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations in eyes undergoing phacoemul-sification cataract surgery with IOL implantation using immersion A-scan ultrasound (US) and Lenstar LS 900~R biometry. In this prospective study, 200 eyes of 200 patients were randomized to undergo either Lenstar LS 900~R or immersion A-scan US biometry to determine the IOL dioptric power prior to phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Post-operative refractive outcomes of these two groups of patients were compared. The result showed no significant difference between the target spherical equivalent (SE) and the post-operative SE value by the Lenstar LS 900~R (p value = 0.632) or immersion A-scan US biometry (p value = 0.438) devices. The magnitude of difference between the two biometric devices were not significantly different (p value = 0.868). There was no significant difference in the predicted post-operative refractive outcome between immersion A-scan US biometry and Lenstar LS 900~R. Based on the results, the immersion A-scan US technique is as accurate as Lenstar LS 900~R in the hands of an experienced operator.
机译:为了确定使用浸入式A扫描超声(US)和Lenstar LS 900〜R生物技术进行人工晶状体白内障摘除术的白内障摘除术白内障手术的眼睛中人工晶状体(IOL)计算的准确性。在这项前瞻性研究中,将200例患者的200只眼睛随机接受Lenstar LS 900〜R或浸入A扫描美国生物特征检查,以确定白内障超声乳化白内障手术之前的IOL屈光度。比较这两组患者的术后屈光结果。结果显示,Lenstar LS 900〜R的目标球当量(SE)与术后SE值(p值= 0.632)或浸入式A扫描US生物测定法(p值= 0.438)之间无显着差异。两个生物识别设备之间的差异幅度没有显着差异(p值= 0.868)。浸入式A扫描US生物测定法和Lenstar LS 900〜R之间的预测术后屈光结果没有显着差异。根据结果​​,在经验丰富的操作员手中,浸入式A扫描美国技术与Lenstar LS 900〜R一样准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号